Quote:
Originally Posted by LilyGrace 
There is a very long chapter about how teachers unconsciously treat students based on what they expect out of them - minorities are less likely to be assessed for being gifted or kept a year back because they're expected to perform lower. It's a lot more than that, and how the subtle ranking within classrooms affect how children see themselves and others.
|
There are so many studies that validate this point that it's not even funny. In my entire Master's (in Teaching) I have seen more of these studies than I truly care to remember. And they span back over at LEAST the last 30 years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LilyGrace 
It struck me.....perhaps this is why hs'd students tend to have higher test scores on average. Could it be that it's not the one on one, exactly, but the fact that they are working at their potential no matter what? That unschoolers, school at homers, all of our children, that the true advantage is that they are just with someone who believes they are capable and expects them to be?
|
Abso-friggin-lutely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Momma Aimee 
for example -- mom expects Jill to learn fracktions ... so mom tried 4 differnt approaches untill Jill get it ...whereas the school teacher doesn't have that option. Also i think you have to compare that --- that we expect our children to do well and have the ablity to keep looking for what they need to succed -- with teh classroom teacher when Jill doesn't get it the frst time in class has to assume it is Jill's problem and not the fault of the teaching method. Where as i think a HS mom or dad is more likly to think the teaching approach is not right than that the child is not right --
|
I agree with that being a contributor, too. But the reality is that we keep trying because we believe in our children.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roar 
I would like to say we all see our kids with fresh eyes and wide open expectations every day I don't believe that's true. I think parents can be as guilty or even more guilty of some of this than teachers. It can be possible for parents to think things like "Johnny isn't a kid who is good at sitting still with activities" even though that was really just Johnny's energy level at age four not a lifelong condition. Or, they may think "people in our family have never been good at math" and overlook that this child has a particular talent in that area. I think there is a lot to be said for having a mix of different adults in a kid's life who will see the child where they are right at that moment.
|
While I don't disagree with you, the studies go beyond just expectations and into WHY those expectations exist due to differences in culture (and by culture, they mean not just race or ethnicity, but family cultures or local cultures that the teacher isn't familiar with or ways of doing things in a family or a locale that the teacher is familiar with or the culture of socioeconomics--be it poverty, middle class or affluence, but different from the teacher). Sometimes it's not even lower expectations that are the problem, but the teacher's belief that a child is defaultly capable of MORE than they are--which is equally problematic.
Those don't exist when a parent is teaching their child. And these are the heaviest factors in teacher expectations being a problem.
I see what you're saying in that things can be overlooked or parents may not see something in their child. I agree with having multiple perspectives (to a point). But I find it hard to believe there is a significant percentage of the homeschooling parent population with lower or higher expectations of their child across the board in a way that significantly affects their overall education--and more importantly, their self-esteem. Unfortunately there aren't any studies on that, though.
Oh... and the studies show that this is not just a teacher-student thing. There were studies done to show that different schools would choose curriculum and teachers implemented teaching methods based on the perceived abilities of the student population. The end results were EXTREMELY disturbing: they taught the wealthier kids to actually think, defend their choices and carry on conversations with authority figures where the lower income kids were taught to recall facts instead of think and only answered questions asked with authority figures (these is nutshelling it obviously).
ETA the study I'm most familiar with on this: Social Class and School Knowledge by Jean Anyon
Curriculum Inquiry, Vol. 11, No. 1. (Spring, 1981), pp. 3-42.
Stable URL:
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=036...3E2.0.CO%3B2-E
So it's a systemic thing--not just a classroom thing.
I can cite the studies if anyone's interested--I just have to dig them out.