Mothering › Forums › Archives › Pregnancy Archives › September 2009 › H1n1
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

H1n1

post #1 of 7
Thread Starter 
We've been sick since just after Gavin was born, and although I thought we were weathering it pretty well, Connor took a turn for the worse today so I took him to the dr (we had avoided the dr before now because there's nothing they can do about a flu anyway!). Turns out he has pneumonia For him that isn't a huge surprise, he has numerous birth defects in his airway and an immune deficiency, so he almost always gets secondary infections from viral bugs. But we made it past the fever stage of the flu, so I thought we were good to go. Guess not.

But, the dr wrote in the chart "H1N1 with secondary pneumonia". I said "it's too late to test him for flu, and we didn't come in for a test earlier, so why did you write down H1N1?" The dr said "it's a clinical diagnosis, you all have/had classic flu symptoms, and right now that's the strain circulating, so it's safe to assume that's what it was." It doesn't matter as far as treating him, he still needs antibiotics for the pneumonia, but it frustrates me that they're diagnosing him clinically without lab confirmation that it was even flu at all!! There are dozens of "flu-like" bugs circulating, we could have just as easily had one of those.

So anyway...beware of reports of the numbers of H1N1 that you might be reading, ebcause we're one family that was "diagnosed" with no proof.
post #2 of 7
I hope he's all better soon!
post #3 of 7
yeah, i saw that on tv, somewhere really scientific like the view, or dr. oz or something, that if you have the flu now then they will determine that it was h1n1 w/o testing since it's the "only strain that's around at the moment."
the trick is to determine of it was really the flu.
post #4 of 7
They aren't even testing people here anymore. Just writing them all up as H1N1. Pisses me off to no end! Way to add those numbers to add to the panic.
post #5 of 7
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tzs View Post
yeah, i saw that on tv, somewhere really scientific like the view, or dr. oz or something, that if you have the flu now then they will determine that it was h1n1 w/o testing since it's the "only strain that's around at the moment."
the trick is to determine of it was really the flu.
Exactly. Our whole house got sick in March with "flu-like symptoms", it was textbook flu, Ian started it with 104 fever for 4 days, he laid on the couch not moving, bad headache, dry cough, really sore throat. But the test for the flu was negative. Then Connor got it, his flu test was also negative (he did get pneumonia that time, too).

So I don't believe any of the numbers!!! We had a "flu-like" illness, no idea if it was "the flu" or what strain it might have been.
post #6 of 7
just as an update...
that thing about "if you have the flu this time of year then it's h1n1" is totally not true.
at the preschool i was working at they've had some h1n1 cases and also a case of flu that was tested to be NOT h1n1.
huh...
post #7 of 7
The thing with the flu tests is that they have a high false negative rate, so it's hard to know for sure.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: September 2009
Mothering › Forums › Archives › Pregnancy Archives › September 2009 › H1n1