Gardasil researcher drops a bombshell -

[Gitti]

http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/...6766677720.txt

“I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all,”

"....the incidence of cervical cancer in the U.S. is already so low that “even if we get the vaccine and continue PAP screening, we will not lower the rate of cervical cancer in the US.”

[Gitti]

I just reread the article and am thinking of how many girls were severely injured or died. It is so sad. Someone ought to be held reliable over this mess. But instead they are going to recommend it for boys.

Money, money, money, that is all the vaccine program is about imho.

[WestCoastDiva]

It is so sad isn't it? Apparently she has had to retract her statements, but hopefully the word is out anyways.

That was a fantastic article.

When this vaccine comes up among my friends and they are all for it I try to remind them that Merck also developed Vioxx knowing full well it was going to hurt/kill people, so why would we trust Merck to develop a safe vaccine for our children (not to mention the fact that it's a useless vaccine to begin with)?

But they don't seem to get it. It's almost as if it scares them to think that if this vaccine isn't safe, maybe the other ones aren't safe and that can be a real mind bender for a lot of people in terms of their general overall security with the world etc the realization that you've possibly been lied to your entire life about this kind of stuff. I know because I went through it 7 years ago when I started researching vaccines.

[Noelle C.]

I've read a few articles about this. Sad how there is no evidence it works longer than 5 years, the cold, hard numbers show far more harm and death per thousand than per thousand who don't get the shot, the makers aren't liable, AND they're recommending it for boys now. If I recall correctly, they only recommend it up to age 25. So we who are older than 25 have no risk of cervical cancer or something? This makes no sense. They KNOW it's not a long-term vax, so I'm confused why the age recommended as the oldest is so young.

Any theories?

[Gitti]

Originally Posted by Noelle C.

If I recall correctly, they only recommend it up to age 25. So we who are older than 25 have no risk of cervical cancer or something? This makes no sense. They KNOW it's not a long-term vax, so I'm confused why the age recommended as the oldest is so young.

Any theories?

By the time we are 25 we have built natural immunity to the viruses that are the culprit (supposedly).

Will the boys be recommended to get their foreskin checked yearly as well?

[Luckyinlife]

I posted this on several sites and someone posted this response which I had not heard of before.....


"There are some red flags that make me question that article...the biggest, Natalie Morton died from a undetected tumour, NOT from a vaccine. Some are still connecting the two. It would be no different than banning WII because a child with a brain tumor died following a game of Cookin' Mama. This article is still drawing a connection

Diane Harper is a controversial researcher. After she finished Gardasil trials, she began Cervarix trials for another company. She blasted Gardasil and pointed out how much better Ceravix would be...she's driven by paychecks to be honest. I can't help but wonder who is sponsoring her latest "outbursts".

I've posted about this researcher before..."

[amnesiac]

Please keep in mind that discussions should focus on vaccine issues rather than individuals and we will not permit speculation.

[KT'smama]

At my LO's last neuro appt. I talked about vaccines with her neurologist. She told me that gardasil is one she'd never give her girls because she'd seen so many healthy kids with problems after they get that shot.
I was so glad to hear her say that!!

[Noelle C.]

Originally Posted by Gitti

By the time we are 25 we have built natural immunity to the viruses that are the culprit (supposedly).

Supposedly! But if we don't get to build up that immunity, what happens when the last shot wears off and there is no immunity anymore? Ugh.