I was wondering if anyone could give me some input on this 
Bear with me...
With my first pregnancy, I went to 41w2d, and I knew my dates. I had a stupid mainstream hospital birth that was pretty traumatic in itself. She was born via induction. Labor was 14 hours long, from administration of pitocin to her birth. Aside from pitocin, they also used a foley catheter to dilate me. I was at a centimeter from 30 weeks, and that got me to 3-4cm. I got frustrated with that and tightned my kegel muscles and it flew out.. after me doing that about 5 times they got the point- I didn't want it. So then they broke my water. After that, labor progressed. I was nearing transition when they somewhat tricked me into an epidural. So I had that done (hell in itself!) and continued dilating. I had a strange reaction to the epidural, I was getting a bit delerious, I was becoming slightly tachycardic.. so then they shot something in my IV and i was fine, but was told afterwards that i couldn't breastfeed
. They checked my cervix, and since my epidural was wearing off (I was greatful), and also since I wasn't yet complete and they figured I had longer to go, they put lidocaine in my epidural. I honestly had no pain,couldn't push, but I felt pressure and knew DD was crowning. By the time I got a nurse in the room her head was out. So all of that, total, 14 hours.
I've heard that epidurals slow labor, and that pitocin and other interventions (the foley, AROM) also slow labor. So is it possible that I'm really a fast laborer, since I wasn't in labor the 30+ hours you often hear about with first babies (let alone induced & epi'ed)? Do you think that with this birth I should prepare have a swifter labor?
If you've had a previous induction, could you let me know how your subsequent natural births have been? TIA

Bear with me...
With my first pregnancy, I went to 41w2d, and I knew my dates. I had a stupid mainstream hospital birth that was pretty traumatic in itself. She was born via induction. Labor was 14 hours long, from administration of pitocin to her birth. Aside from pitocin, they also used a foley catheter to dilate me. I was at a centimeter from 30 weeks, and that got me to 3-4cm. I got frustrated with that and tightned my kegel muscles and it flew out.. after me doing that about 5 times they got the point- I didn't want it. So then they broke my water. After that, labor progressed. I was nearing transition when they somewhat tricked me into an epidural. So I had that done (hell in itself!) and continued dilating. I had a strange reaction to the epidural, I was getting a bit delerious, I was becoming slightly tachycardic.. so then they shot something in my IV and i was fine, but was told afterwards that i couldn't breastfeed
. They checked my cervix, and since my epidural was wearing off (I was greatful), and also since I wasn't yet complete and they figured I had longer to go, they put lidocaine in my epidural. I honestly had no pain,couldn't push, but I felt pressure and knew DD was crowning. By the time I got a nurse in the room her head was out. So all of that, total, 14 hours.I've heard that epidurals slow labor, and that pitocin and other interventions (the foley, AROM) also slow labor. So is it possible that I'm really a fast laborer, since I wasn't in labor the 30+ hours you often hear about with first babies (let alone induced & epi'ed)? Do you think that with this birth I should prepare have a swifter labor?
If you've had a previous induction, could you let me know how your subsequent natural births have been? TIA










They broke my water at 10 pm, my labor started about 6 hours later and lasted about 3 hours.