Quote:
Originally Posted by Cupressa 
Preventing the broth from boiling rapidly is important (for this method). It keeps the broth clearer and the flavor is better, I think. It preserves the quality of the fat, if you use that part. If broth is boiled to much, the fat seems to me to lose its flavor or go rancid (in the case of poultry or fish stock).
After straining, the meat and vegetables can be added to some of the broth for a delicious soup, and none of it goes to waste.
|
Interesting that you find you get a clearer broth w/ a gentler boil. I've definitely had some cloudy results recently - maybe I need to make sure the heat stays nice and low (although I actually think I did that?!).
I'm wondering about several "options" in broth making:
- vinegar/acid: do you notice a more gelatinous broth w/ it? or any other noticeable improvements? I've used vinegar haphazardly, as in tossing some in once in a while! but not noticed anything
- skimming: I know S. Fallon calls for it - when exactly (if you do it) do you skim? It seems like there's *always* something that could be skimmed off the top - how discrminating are you?
- time: can it boil "too long"? I never seem to worry about not enough time, cuz I'll just turn it way down and let it keep going if I'm not ready to strain and cool it
- veggies for flavor (and obviously nutrition): does it make much of a difference if you're going to use the broth for soup later, and planning to add the veggies later? I hate the thought of losing the veggies (though I'm sure most of their value is imparted in the slow cooking) and would rather make sure they're fully consumed in a soup later on...
I think there were some other things I was wondering about, but those are some of my current ponderings.