DD is almost 4yo and had 10 teeth with various stages of decay. We found a laser dentist to take care of the first 8, but the two worst ones were too deep for fillings. Our goal was to avoid GA.
Now we are facing the prospect of conscious sedation which I am reading has its own risks, so I am going to try for nitrous oxide but I am doubting the dentist will agree to that based on my DD's long experience and lost innocense with dentists.
SO, my goal is to make this as quick and painless as possible. So I am wondering if it would be better to just do an extraction with a spacer rather than a pulpectomy and crown. Which is faster? I understand that the goal is to save the tooth, I get that, but these are temporary teeth (9 yr molars I believe) and if it will not matter in the long run, I would seriously just opt for the quickest procedure.
Any advice much appreciated!
Now we are facing the prospect of conscious sedation which I am reading has its own risks, so I am going to try for nitrous oxide but I am doubting the dentist will agree to that based on my DD's long experience and lost innocense with dentists.
SO, my goal is to make this as quick and painless as possible. So I am wondering if it would be better to just do an extraction with a spacer rather than a pulpectomy and crown. Which is faster? I understand that the goal is to save the tooth, I get that, but these are temporary teeth (9 yr molars I believe) and if it will not matter in the long run, I would seriously just opt for the quickest procedure.
Any advice much appreciated!









