My cervix is showing NO signs of opening/labor.
I am just over 40 weeks going into 41 at the moment. Baby is measuring 95% for everything.
My OB has said a few times now my cervix 'might just not open' (is that even possible?
) This is my first child and probably our only.
The doctor is fine waiting until I am well over 2.5 weeks 'overdue' to try an induction.. if the induction fails, I will have to have a c-section she said.
My placenta is calcifying already. . . but otherwise I have had zero complications during my pregnancy.
I am debating at this point if its less invasive/traumatic to just schedule a c-section for Dec 18th or if I should try an induction on a cervix that has apparently no interest in cooperating anyway.. ?
She said on pit I would be allowed 4 hours and if there were no signs of my cervix opening, she wouldn't continue it because it would just be unnecessary drugs/stress/work for me. (on a side note: the women in my family were all induced at 42 weeks, most failed on gel but not on pit).
I am wondering if its more invasive to try an induction which the Doc feels will fail if my cervix isn't open then it is just having a c-section scheduled for 42.5 weeks?
Has anyone been in this situation before? I could use some personal experience and stories (good or bad)
I am just over 40 weeks going into 41 at the moment. Baby is measuring 95% for everything.My OB has said a few times now my cervix 'might just not open' (is that even possible?
) This is my first child and probably our only.The doctor is fine waiting until I am well over 2.5 weeks 'overdue' to try an induction.. if the induction fails, I will have to have a c-section she said.
My placenta is calcifying already. . . but otherwise I have had zero complications during my pregnancy.
I am debating at this point if its less invasive/traumatic to just schedule a c-section for Dec 18th or if I should try an induction on a cervix that has apparently no interest in cooperating anyway.. ?

She said on pit I would be allowed 4 hours and if there were no signs of my cervix opening, she wouldn't continue it because it would just be unnecessary drugs/stress/work for me. (on a side note: the women in my family were all induced at 42 weeks, most failed on gel but not on pit).
I am wondering if its more invasive to try an induction which the Doc feels will fail if my cervix isn't open then it is just having a c-section scheduled for 42.5 weeks?

Has anyone been in this situation before? I could use some personal experience and stories (good or bad)










so I am going to try to see her this week.. 
