First of all, I'm new to these forums, so hello!
I'm about 17 weeks pregnant and seriously considering having an unassisted delivery, but I need a little advice/encouragement.
The birth of my son was a little bit of a fiasco. I had planned a homebirth, but we thought I was going into labor a full month early (I'm convinced I got my dates wrong), so we rushed off to the hospital. By the time I got there, my contractions were about 45 seconds apart and I was 3cm and 80% effaced, and we discovered that I had mild pre-eclampsia as well.
All told, I was only in labor for a total of 3-4 hours, but I ended up in the hospital for almost a week. They tried to halt my labor at first, but the drugs wore off after about 24 hours. I had my baby a couple hours after that, and then they wanted to keep us there for observation for a couple of days. At the end of those two days, my son developed jaundice (not surprising given that he hadn't seen any natural light), and we ended up staying for another 3-4 days because he needed light therapy.
This time around, I'm even more determined to have the baby at home. I don't particularly want an unassisted pregnancy - I'm fine with having prenatal care. Truth be told, I wouldn't mind having a midwife attend the birth either, but I can't find any local home birth midwives.
So it looks like my only two options are to either have the baby at the hospital (attended by a nurse-midwife), or to have the baby at home, with just hubby and maybe a couple other friends/family members.
I am completely confident that I can deliver the baby on my own, but my husband is VERY uncomfortable with the idea. I suggested that his mother could attend the birth (she had her younger 3 at home and has helped out at several other births), and he seems mostly okay with that.. But then when I talked to his mom about it, she expressed that she didn't think it was a good idea, given my "history."
I'm really frustrated by this, because I don't really HAVE a "history." I had a really fast, easy labor that was complicated by not listening to my body. I don't think my son was premature. I had a perfectly healthy pregnancy, with no risk factors for or indications of preterm labor, and he was born well within the range of normal birthweight, strong, healthy, etc. So really the ONLY issue with my last pregnancy was mild pre-eclampsia at term. EVERYTHING else that made it a complicated ordeal was caused by being in the hospital in the first place.
So I guess I have to ask - am I being foolish for planning an unassisted childbirth after having had mild pre-eclampsia last time? I honestly don't see what the big deal is, especially if I have prenatal care and keep an eye on my blood pressure and everything.
I'm a little concerned because I know my husband doesn't like the idea - the only way I could get him to stop freaking out was by agreeing to have his mom there. But after her reaction, I don't know that I WANT her there. My line of thinking is that I just need another person there to keep hubby calm, but it seems like she'll be there looking for something to go wrong.
I want to have SOMEONE there with me, but at the same time, I don't want to feel like I have to hold THEIR hands through this and reassure THEM that everything is okay. I want to be able to relax and listen to my body and just go with it.
Please tell me that's okay? Any advice on how to help hubby come around would be appreciated too.
I'm about 17 weeks pregnant and seriously considering having an unassisted delivery, but I need a little advice/encouragement.
The birth of my son was a little bit of a fiasco. I had planned a homebirth, but we thought I was going into labor a full month early (I'm convinced I got my dates wrong), so we rushed off to the hospital. By the time I got there, my contractions were about 45 seconds apart and I was 3cm and 80% effaced, and we discovered that I had mild pre-eclampsia as well.
All told, I was only in labor for a total of 3-4 hours, but I ended up in the hospital for almost a week. They tried to halt my labor at first, but the drugs wore off after about 24 hours. I had my baby a couple hours after that, and then they wanted to keep us there for observation for a couple of days. At the end of those two days, my son developed jaundice (not surprising given that he hadn't seen any natural light), and we ended up staying for another 3-4 days because he needed light therapy.
This time around, I'm even more determined to have the baby at home. I don't particularly want an unassisted pregnancy - I'm fine with having prenatal care. Truth be told, I wouldn't mind having a midwife attend the birth either, but I can't find any local home birth midwives.
So it looks like my only two options are to either have the baby at the hospital (attended by a nurse-midwife), or to have the baby at home, with just hubby and maybe a couple other friends/family members.
I am completely confident that I can deliver the baby on my own, but my husband is VERY uncomfortable with the idea. I suggested that his mother could attend the birth (she had her younger 3 at home and has helped out at several other births), and he seems mostly okay with that.. But then when I talked to his mom about it, she expressed that she didn't think it was a good idea, given my "history."
I'm really frustrated by this, because I don't really HAVE a "history." I had a really fast, easy labor that was complicated by not listening to my body. I don't think my son was premature. I had a perfectly healthy pregnancy, with no risk factors for or indications of preterm labor, and he was born well within the range of normal birthweight, strong, healthy, etc. So really the ONLY issue with my last pregnancy was mild pre-eclampsia at term. EVERYTHING else that made it a complicated ordeal was caused by being in the hospital in the first place.
So I guess I have to ask - am I being foolish for planning an unassisted childbirth after having had mild pre-eclampsia last time? I honestly don't see what the big deal is, especially if I have prenatal care and keep an eye on my blood pressure and everything.
I'm a little concerned because I know my husband doesn't like the idea - the only way I could get him to stop freaking out was by agreeing to have his mom there. But after her reaction, I don't know that I WANT her there. My line of thinking is that I just need another person there to keep hubby calm, but it seems like she'll be there looking for something to go wrong.
I want to have SOMEONE there with me, but at the same time, I don't want to feel like I have to hold THEIR hands through this and reassure THEM that everything is okay. I want to be able to relax and listen to my body and just go with it.
Please tell me that's okay? Any advice on how to help hubby come around would be appreciated too.












