Mothering › Forums › Parenting › What do you think is the best age-gap for spacing children?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

What do you think is the best age-gap for spacing children?

post #1 of 50
Thread Starter 
DH and I are thinking of DC2. The debate is b/w having one closer together (18m) or having one later (2ys or more). I would love to hear the joys and struggles about both options from different mommas.

Concerns I have about having them close together: Will I go insane? Will I be able to give enough attention to both? Will I still have time with DH? Would 3 (if I wanted a 3rd baby) close together be too much? If DC1 isn't sleeping well, can I have another non-sleeper?

Concerns I have about having them further apart: When I get used to toddler stage, I'm going to have to go back to baby stage.... is it better to go through the stages all at once?

Questions, questions, questions.... I would LOVE to hear what experienced mommas have to say.
post #2 of 50
It is absolutely impossible to tell you . So much depends on your personal likes/dislikes, how you work with your partner, the personalities of the kids, etc.

I can tell you for US, 4 yrs apart is great. They are in different stages, so it is pretty easy to get every ones needs met. They still can have fun together, as the older one really understands and has patience with the baby stuff. Tonight the two of them played in a big box and had a blast. Yes, it DOES kind of feel like I've beeb doing the baby/toddler thing forever, but the second time around is not as hard in many ways because you know what to expect and how to deal with most of it.

Honestly, if we have any more kids, I would definately do another 3-5 yr age gap! It is really nice this way.

Of course, some really like them closer together. It is intense, but there are perks too. It is a choice.
post #3 of 50
As PP mentioned it really is a personal choice. Our son's are 2yrs 10 months apart and that seemed to be pretty good spacing. It gave our first son time to be an only and me to learn to be a better parent but yet they are close enough in age that they do have some similar likes and they are able to play pretty well together. My DD is behind them by five years and eight years respectively. I love this because while they are at school I have plenty of time to indulge her and her older brothers are able to help out by reading, playing, etc with her. I like it both ways!
post #4 of 50
My DD and DS are 27 months apart and i feel like it is too close for my liking. I would have prefered 3.5-4 years differance, but fate ahd other plans, KIWM? Yes it is a shock to go back to diapers and that full dependence that an infant is, but that stage is so short really (DS is 9 months and I feel like he is such a big kid already!).

For me and our life, there is no way we could handle under 2 years seperation w/o a breakdown. Plus I like to savor the baby stage as much as possible and that isn't possible when you have 2 going thru it at once (twins being hte exception cuz you don't have a choice really!).
post #5 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexsam View Post
It is absolutely impossible to tell you . So much depends on your personal likes/dislikes, how you work with your partner, the personalities of the kids, etc.

I can tell you for US, 4 yrs apart is great. They are in different stages, so it is pretty easy to get every ones needs met. They still can have fun together, as the older one really understands and has patience with the baby stuff. Tonight the two of them played in a big box and had a blast. Yes, it DOES kind of feel like I've beeb doing the baby/toddler thing forever, but the second time around is not as hard in many ways because you know what to expect and how to deal with most of it.

Honestly, if we have any more kids, I would definately do another 3-5 yr age gap! It is really nice this way.

Of course, some really like them closer together. It is intense, but there are perks too. It is a choice.
I agree that it depends on what else everyone brings to the table. DH and his brother were 18 months apart and we both thought that was too close. In their case, they were competitive.

I always thought 4 years would be perfect for us to avoid that kind of competition. They wouldn't be in HS together, one would be starting kindy as the other became a toddler. I liked the idea of having them at different stages.

On the other hand, that "plan" didn't work out for us and we'll have a 7 year age gap. I'm LEAST close to my sib who is 7 years older than me, but I keep telling myself it's personality, not age. I'm actaully closer to my sibs who are 10 and 12 years older than me.
post #6 of 50
For us: 2 years 9 months has been just perfect.
post #7 of 50
I can not do close spacing, having multiple children is hetic enough without the craziness that goes along with 2 babies at once. DD2 and DS are 2.5 years apart, that is too close for me. I'd love 3-4 years personally, DD1 and DD2 were that spacing and it was SOO nice. They still play together but are far enough apart not to be competitive like another poster mentioned. My sister and I were exactly 2 years apart, that was too close for us, we were very competitive as children. Not to mention the violent fights we used to get into. DH and his brother were farther apart, his older bro did stuff like feed him cat food but they didn't fight like my sister and I did. When I say fight, I mean really fight, both of us bear the scars of battle wounds.


I don't buy into the whole thing that closer spaced siblings will be playmates or best friends, it is totally dependent on personality. Having had 3 children at once that all woke up at night, (DD1 has severe anxiety and resulting night terrors and insomnia) even 2 at once is a nightmare. The reason that I had DD2 and DS closer together was because if we do decide to go for a 4th then I didn't want to be doing the whole baby thing forever. In hindsight, I would have much rather done it for another year then to have to deal with the aftermath of having a baby when DD2 was still a baby herself. When you have a baby, you think a 2 year is so big but then when you have a 2 year, you realize that they are just a big baby.
post #8 of 50
Mine are 4 years apart. I like that they each get to go through each stage separately. And I loved the huge break between diapers.
post #9 of 50
Something else that is is important to me is milk supply. I want my children to get a full 2 years of breastmilk, not always possible with a pg. Since DD2 and DS are 2.5 years apart, my milk dried up right before DD2 was 2 years old. She did not handle it well, and I will always regret that. She continued to nurse throughout the entire pg, but dry nursing is very painfully for me and just not the same without milk for obvious reasons.
post #10 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alyantavid View Post
Mine are 4 years apart. I like that they each get to go through each stage separately. And I loved the huge break between diapers.
Mine will be 4 years apart as well. This is what DH and I had planned on a f about a year or so after DS#1 was born. But yes, like some pp's have said, it all depends on personal preference.
post #11 of 50
My children are 2 1/2 years apart and they are best of friends. We homeschool so they are always together (DS is now 10 and DD is 8) and they have played together wonderfully since DD was about 1.

The decision can depend on your age, too. If you are getting up in age, you might consider closer spacing, just to ensure that you get the amount of children you want before your body makes it more difficult for you.
post #12 of 50
I have four kids all 2 years apart (23-25 months spacing each time). For us, it has worked out wonderfully (including tandem nursing the last round). But, since it's all I know, I really don't have anything to compare it to. I think it's really individual. Depends on the child(ren), the parents, the overall situation, yk? For me, I thought anything under 2 years apart would have been too much for me - personally - but plenty of people feel the same way about a 3 or less year gap. I would say, anwhere from 2-5 years sounds ideal in my mind. That pretty much covers most families age differences And really, I can totally see the advantages of an even larger (5+) age gap, too, now that I see my 8 yo and how she interacts with the 2 yo.

No right or wrong way to do it, IMO. If nursing for at least 2 full years is important to you, then I would say wait until that point to TTC. There's no guarantee with milk supply, so getting pregnant before you and the LO are ready to wean can be risky.
post #13 of 50
I think there are plusses and minuses to both, and you have to sort through what's more important to you.

Having said that, I think gentle discipline is a lot more difficult when you have a baby and a toddler, or two toddlers, than when the older one is beyond toddler age. That is what pushed me to a longer gap.
post #14 of 50
the challenges to AP are pretty huge with a spacing of less than 2 yrs, IMO. not to say anything is impossible, but i agree w/those who have said in this thread that becoming pregnant with LO still only one year old is a lot on your body & tough on your nursling potentially.

i also don't think it makes for instant playmates. i agree that 2.5 - 4 years seems pretty ideal for how i want to parent.
post #15 of 50
I think the best time is when you're able to get pg again.

When DD1 was a baby, I and a friend of mine both planned to have our first two kids 2 years apart (her DD1 is 3m older than my DD1). I got pg much sooner than expected, having my kids 16.5m apart. She wasn't able to get pg when she wanted to, and her kids ended up being 3 years apart. There are people with limited fertility (or aproaching menopause) who want kids close in age so they can have as many kids as possible while they still can.

Then there were another 5.5 years until I had DS. So I've experienced both- kids close in age and kids further apart. I enjoyed DS' infancy a lot more than DD2's, and his toddlerhood more than either of their toddlerhoods. When I had two babies, or was pg with a baby, I was just tired and overwhelmed most of the time. I really feel like I wasn't able to fully meet DD2's emotional needs (which I made up for when she was 10 and 11 and homeschooled while her siblings were both in school.) It was nice having "big kids" around when I had a baby (a 5yo can entertain a baby for 3 minutes while I get to pee alone!), and it was nice having only one baby at a time.

I wish I could tell you that the girls are now the best of friends, but they're not. DD2 really feels left out when she's not included with DD1's friends, since she's not that much younger- but some of DD1's friends just don't hit it off with DD2. I imagine the same situation happens with twins as well. And as far as being best friends as adults- well, my mom and her sister are 14 YEARS apart and best friends now. Age gap has nothing to do with their eventual adult relationship, but it has a lot do to with how hard it is to parent them when they're little.

DS does get bored at times, being the only "little kid" in the family. But he's currently having a playdate with a 6yo, and he loves playing with his 5yo cousin. I don't think kids need to be close in age to be companions.

If I was to "choose" child spacing, I would suggest further spacing. It's easier on the parents (so you can focus on their needs more exclusively when they're babies) and it seems to have zero effect on their relationships when they're older. Closely spaced kids might not get along, and kids far in age can still be great friends.
post #16 of 50
We havea 4 year spacing here, DS is not even month old yet so I don't have lots of experience with it. I'm adjusting to a second baby but so far it's going well. DD loves the baby and wants to help me in every possible way. She says that she can't wait for Owen to get older so they can play together.
post #17 of 50
Here's a totally generic, unhelpful answer: there isn't a BEST. There are so many variables, and there are pluses and minuses to all spacings. All I can tell you is my sister and I hated being five years apart, so I'm having mine 2 years apart.
post #18 of 50
My sisters and I are relative close in age (17 months and 4 years, I am the oldest) and we were best friends and still are best friends.
We dealt with infertility with DD, so we didn't plan a spacing, we just tried asap after DD. But in the end it was still quite close, DD and DS 2 years and DS and expected baby 2 years + 9 months. My milk dried up for DD, but we continued through the pregnancy. Therefore we didn't start the 3rd before DS was 2 years old, to give him 2 years of full supply (and then got pregnant right away, woohoo). DD and DS play a lot together now. The first year was hard but it worked out.

Carma
post #19 of 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by intrepidmother View Post
DH and I are thinking of DC2. The debate is b/w having one closer together (18m) or having one later (2ys or more). I would love to hear the joys and struggles about both options from different mommas.

Concerns I have about having them close together: Will I go insane? Will I be able to give enough attention to both? Will I still have time with DH? Would 3 (if I wanted a 3rd baby) close together be too much? If DC1 isn't sleeping well, can I have another non-sleeper?

Concerns I have about having them further apart: When I get used to toddler stage, I'm going to have to go back to baby stage.... is it better to go through the stages all at once?

Questions, questions, questions.... I would LOVE to hear what experienced mommas have to say.
My first two are 13 months apart, and my third will be born when DS is 3 yrs 3 mo and DD is 2 yrs 2 mos.

I will say that we had planned to have our first two within 2 years of one another, but NOT 13 mos apart. So much for LAM as birth control

I can tell you that I have nothing to compare it to other than my own childhood, but I am really thrilled and feel grateful for my closely spaced kiddos. I am blessed with very easy pregnancies and pregnancy recoveries, which absolutely contributed to my feelings. It was easy going through my first trimester when I had a LO who was still immobile ~ Chasing toddlers around is quite exhausting. It was also easy carrying/babywearing him everywhere through my pregnancy ~ I'm already finding carrying my 30 lb 20 mos old OR my 37 lb almost 3 year old exhausting this go round and I am only 17 weeks PG!

Another thing that I liked was the way that being pregnant slowed me down and REALLY allowed me to savor my first childs babyhood. I was not out at 3000 gymboree or makin music classes or whatever because I was very aware that another baby was on the way and I wanted to keep things very slow, very intentional, and treasure those moments in a way that someone can only when they are truly acutely aware of how they are about to change.

Bringing home a new baby with another one so young made it great in that we didn't have to deal with any sibling jealousy/rivalry etc. Our kids are young still, but are truly best friends and spend the day playing together, which makes life great for me. They also nap for 3 hours at the exact same time every day, which is awesome and allows me to get all of my needs met during that time so that when they are awake again I can focus on them.

I agree with the PP who said that age is certainly a factor, I had a lot of goals that I needed/wanted to meet before I had children, and I also had the goal of being done having children by 37 or so. I wanted to buy my own house and achieve all of my career objectives before I had kids as our plan was for me to be a SAHM once we started a family. I did what I wanted to do career/travel wise, and had my first at 31, my second at 32, and my third is due when I am 34. Should we decide to have one more I will still skate in well before 37. I was not willing in nor interested in spacing out my kids every 4 years as I wanted several.

We were not close in spread in my family (I am 3.5 years older than my brother and 8 years older than my sister) and I wanted different for my family.

I love doing activities that constantly engage both of my kids, it makes events like the zoo or the please touch museum easy as they are close enough to be interested in all of the same things. I like that if I chose, it would make reentering the work force easier as they will all be in school without a decade or so passing.

It works for us. I have a ton of help from my DH (who WAH) and a great support system of friends and family. Without those things I can see how it might feel harder ~ especially when the second gets mobile and the first is still so young.

It really comes down to you ~ to what you want or how you envision your family. I like being "IN" it ~ Just in the heart of these childbearing years~ I have been pregnant, nursing, and nursing and pregnant now since May of 06, and I love it. It works for me/us. I can see how that might not work for everyone, however. I also agree with the PP who said that your fertility will of course play a role in it as well ~ I have many friends who were emotionally ready for another baby before they physically were due to breastfeeding. It was a bit the opposite for me That is a hard thing to factor into your decision though as you might not know what your body will do ahead of time, you know?

I found zero conflict between close spaced sibs and AP, and am surprised to hear that some do.

ETA ~ As to your time with DH question, I have tons of time with my DH. The kids are so young that they both go to bed early (7 and 7.30) allowing us lots of free time together. They also play together, which frees he or I from playing 3000 rounds of cars of teaparty or whatever ~ we can do those things when we choose, but are not forced into it for their entertainment as they do those things together. I think that it would be different if I had a much older and a much younger child at the same time.

As to your "stages" question ~ I found it great to have hand me down that are current, to have my maternity clothes still be in fashion, to have all of our carseats and whatnot still work as they are within the safety period and not expired or whatnot. So yes, I find it really easy to be in this stage all at once, before we move as a family into the next stage (School years etc) ~


It also kept me from being perfectionistic ~ I don't know how to word this correctly, but it kept me from considering my first, or any of my subsequent children as the sole center of the universe. It put some of the idealistic parts of parenting on the back burner and freed me from unrealistic expectations or compete child centeredness. For me, that was a good thing for me, and helped me maintain balance.

I know that it isn't for everyone but I would not change a second of the way our children have been spaced



GL with whatever you decide!
post #20 of 50
If our plan goes the way we want it to go our children will be 3.5 years apart exactly! It sounds perfect in my head and will only work if i get pregnant in May (which i hope i do)! but who knows! All I know is that my sister and I are 6 years apart and I swore i'd never do that because it's waaaay to far.

I remember being annoyed with her all the time and as i got older I became resentful because she was allowed to do things i wasn't at her age, she got more "stuff" than me...etc.

I DO however believe that it has a lot to do with how our parents raised us. They were not good at all at teaching us how to solve conflicts and there answer was always "stop doing that holly" because obviously since i was older i was always in the wrong...grrr
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Parenting
Mothering › Forums › Parenting › What do you think is the best age-gap for spacing children?