Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › Another bf in church situation
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Another bf in church situation  

post #1 of 116
Thread Starter 
I was taken by surprise today, I was sharply reprimanded for not agreeing to use an additional cover when breastfeeding without a single mm of flesh on display.

I was meeting with my pastor (male) and his assistant (female) in his office, I've nursed there several times before and a couple of weeks ago there was an email sent that had actually said that of course nursing was welcome in church if we ourselves were comfortable.

A little after a began nursing, the woman suddenly jumped up and said she'd find something to cover me, my first response was to say no need, thanks, but she insisted, so when she dropped it on my, I removed it and again said no thanks and stated that I do not use a cover when nursing - this is something I have thought about a fair amount and have decided that it is simply a no go area for me.

I wouldn't have been at all happy if the response to that had been to say ok, that's your choice, this is my office, you're welcome to come back in when you've finished, but it would have been a lot better than what did happen.

The conversation kept jumping between the issue of me nursing there and then and nursing in church, so it's hard to say exactly what was a response to what, but voices were raised and none of them were mine, I should submit to spiritual authority, being loving and be considerate to the needs of others etc.

Apparently men have been complaining to the pastor about women nursing and thus he felt we should use covers to avoid any risk, I felt they were just so ticked off that I'd stood up to them that they ignored me mentioning that a cover could be difficult to use and didn't remove any risk as I've seen just as much, if not more when a cover has been used.

At some point I brought up the law, we're in WA so a law protecting bfing came into action on 26th July this year, I felt harrassed, it seemed a reasonable way to defend oneself, but apparently the law is irrelevant, there was mention that they will be creating a bfing policy and that the email that had gone out (it was from the nursery coordinator) had been approved by them, they didn't seem to get that the law protects me whether I cover up or not as they argued that I wasn't being told not to breastfeed and obviously as they had more experience than me I should defer to them, sure, his wife fed 5 kids, she herself said she'd fed 4 for 2 years each and had been part of LLL. All of that made it worse as it's not like they are lacking in knowledge and need to be educated.

I do agree with the basic premise of making compromises for the weaker brother, but I do struggle with the idea that any of these men genuinely found it caused them a struggle, rather than that they feared it would because they were conditioned by society to think that way. I also feel that if I were to say I struggled with something that it being something less acceptable to have a problem with that it wouldn't be treated like this, like if I said I had a problem with the pastor wearing flip flops because I had an unusual foot fetish (I don't, btw), I'd probably be laughed at rather than every man wearing flip flops be told to cover them up.

I don't think either of them even know I'm involved with LLL, they do know I went the extra mile to get DD on to the breast as they saw us tube feeding her for a couple of months, but I was treated as if I was being completely non compromising on a single issue and was basically being very unchristian about the whole thing.

So it seems like they likely will bring in an official policy of having to cover up other than in the nursing room (new as of a couple of weeks ago, hence the email), which I have a huge problem with, because regardless of my own personal feeling about covering up, I don't believe covering up is a universal solution, it's entirely possible you'd see less of me without a cover than another woman with one, but if I point that out and it's accepted, then potentially nursing would be restricted to the nursing room, which could no way accomodate all the nursing mums in the church either comfortably or uncomfortably and personally I actually feel less comfortable nursing in a nursing room than I do sat in a row of seats where no one is facing towards me!

Just to add to all my hurt and emotion, the pastor then told my husband, but didn't present the truth of what happened, just told him that I had a disrespectful attitude, which given that things are hard between us right now is just adding material to the fire.

I've no idea how to approach this, I suspect of the current nursing mums that I probably am the only one who feels particularly strongly about it and I daren't mention it to anyone because it would be seen as devisive, which I'm not trying to be. We were told the nursing room was opened because people were going in and out of the regular nursery too often and it was disturbing the older babies and toddlers, which indicates that most other nursing mums don't feel comfortable nursing in church to begin with.
post #2 of 116
How awful I cant tell you what to do but if it where me that would be the last time my shadow ever darkened the door of that church.
post #3 of 116
I'm very sorry to hear about this.

As I'm not American: does the state law apply to church policies or not? If it doesn't it could still be used as an "orientation" but you probably couldn't "make" them act accordingly.

That said, I find it extremely upsetting that in the context of Christian faith mothers are harrassed for breastfeeding their children. From what you're describing in your post you were in no way "exposing" yourself - this should be modest enough.

Imagine a picture of Mary with baby Jesus and a nursing cover! Or maybe she should've pumped and used a bottle - after all, she had visitors in that stable. (The shepherds and the wise men must have been really ticked off by her lack of modesty!)

So, where do you go from there? If I were in your place I'd probably try to find some allies in your church and work from there.

(And while you're working on the bf policy they might consider implementing a "no ties for men" rule. Just consider what area ties are pointing to - there are teenagers around here, gasp!)
post #4 of 116
Jesus was BF. true true..... YOur post cracked me up!
IDK what advise to give you. My DH and I would have made a stink. POssibly publicly. On the way out the door btw.

Sarah


Quote:
Originally Posted by proudmomof4 View Post
I'm very sorry to hear about this.

As I'm not American: does the state law apply to church policies or not? If it doesn't it could still be used as an "orientation" but you probably couldn't "make" them act accordingly.

That said, I find it extremely upsetting that in the context of Christian faith mothers are harrassed for breastfeeding their children. From what you're describing in your post you were in no way "exposing" yourself - this should be modest enough.

Imagine a picture of Mary with baby Jesus and a nursing cover! Or maybe she should've pumped and used a bottle - after all, she had visitors in that stable. (The shepherds and the wise men must have been really ticked off by her lack of modesty!)

So, where do you go from there? If I were in your place I'd probably try to find some allies in your church and work from there.

(And while you're working on the bf policy they might consider implementing a "no ties for men" rule. Just consider what area ties are pointing to - there are teenagers around here, gasp!)
post #5 of 116
I would never go there again. And I would let every local mothering list in your area know its a mother/baby unfriendly place.
post #6 of 116
Whoa. After all that he told your husband on you?!? I could never go back and I would make one heck of a stink for them. My dh's church is somewhat conservative + older congregation and I've nursed during communion without anyone batting an eye.

I'm so sorry you were treayed that way Mama.
post #7 of 116
is this church part of a bigger movement? like calvery? maybe you could contact the "mother ship" as it were.

also i would never go back, and i would send out an all church email telling everyone why. with a painting of jesus breastfeeding.

but that is just me
post #8 of 116
Yikes. Sounds like someone has some serious control issues. I'm conservative, sorta: but while I'm for wifely submission I take it as a means for women to increase their holiness and devotion to God, not as a weapon used by random men to control a woman by tattling to her husband! And while I'm for modesty, I simply don't think breastfeeding comes under that radar, period. Breastfeeding does not involve lascivious or sexual nudity: it is not an act calculated to excite lust or make husbands jealous or tempt church-going men's minds away from the sermon. It is about FEEDING a BABY.

I know finding a church with compatible beliefs in a given geographical area is complex, so leaving may not be the answer: but at the least, you should inform the powers that be that "opting out" of laws protecting breastfeeding is simply not an option. If they're into submitting to authorities, perhaps you could point out that the Bible commands Christians to submit to governmental authorities... the ones that say you can't discriminate against breastfeeding women!
post #9 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by uumomma View Post
also i would never go back, and i would send out an all church email telling everyone why. with a painting of jesus breastfeeding.

but that is just me
Not just you - I'd join you! I think I'd send along a classic da Vinci...
http://www.gfmer.ch/Art_for_Health/I...onna_Litta.jpg
post #10 of 116
Oh, PatioGardener, I think that is great!

Annekh23, maybe you can get the above image transferred on to a small blanket or piece of fleece. Then use THAT as your cover. Neatly laid, so everyone can clearly see the image.

A breast that's feeding a baby is NOT THE SAME as a boob being used sexually. And maybe a beautiful image of Mary and Jesus would get that point across.
post #11 of 116
Thread Starter 
Tempting though it is to just leave, it would essentially prove their point that I am placing high priority on a single issue above and beyond other aspects of christian and church life.

I love the cover idea, though it also would be provocative and doesn't fit with my no cover stance, it might be good for other people in other situations though!

The church isn't part of any organisation, it's a plant from another church and is less than a year old, I could talk to someone at the parent church, but I doubt they would support my stance on breastfeeding anyway, so my only support would be in how badly handled the situation was, but if I were to do that and their senior pastor decided to talk to our pastor, it would take a miracle for me still not to be labelled as devisive and pushing a single issue.

I feel so stuck right now that it's a case of dammed if I do, dammed if I don't. Simply because I'm a breastfeeding mum, anything I say in support of it will be seen as self justification.

They say that the rule would be for the sake of others, but it distresses me what effect that has on the nursing women, I know for me that if I'd been presented with that rule earlier on, even with the explanation, I think it would still have effected by body image and sense of self worth.

My Dd (3rd child) is almost 7 mths, we had a really rough start to breastfeeding, it's only been in the last couple of months that she's been competent enough at it that I might have had a spare hand to juggle a cover, cover up just doesn't work as a solution for me, because I know from personal experience that cover up would have meant not breastfeeding in that location and by extension you never know where your weaker brother might pop up, so it mean anywhere out of the home.
post #12 of 116
Thread Starter 
Just to add, the painting would be dismissed by the excuse of "culture", that arguement was thrown at me too, that maybe me breastfeeding without a cover is ok in the UK, but it isn't here (ie the USA), so I need to be sensitive to the local culture.

Actually the impression I get from the bible, even though it's written in a culture where not breastfeeding would mean death, that it's still seen as a very positive thing, not just the norm, it's mentioned in an extremely positive way in the psalms and in some prophecy. The OT certainly views it as something excellent and praiseworthy, i.e. something that according to Philipians 4 we are commanded to think about!
post #13 of 116
They are wrong, and their policy is illegal. If you don't want to leave the church over this, then your options are to:

1. Do what they say and cover your DD while she nurses in church.
2. Ignore what they say and nurse your DD in church without a cover.

What do you want to do?
post #14 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by annekh23 View Post
Tempting though it is to just leave, it would essentially prove their point that I am placing high priority on a single issue above and beyond other aspects of christian and church life.
I think we were int he same DD club!

I want to caveat that I am not a christian, but I am religious (Jewish).

My concern here is that this seems like such an unsupportive environment. I don't think you should be worried about proving how Christian or unChristian you are. I mean, isn't that between you and Christ? So long as you are not harming others, isn't it not a human judgment? As I said, I am Jewish, and we have 613 commandments that we are supposed to follow, and many are open to strict Rabbinical interpretation, but it is certainly not within the right of a rabbi to decide who is or is not a good Jew. That is G-d's judgment.

I am sorry to say, but this place sounds almost cult-like in its insistence that you adhere to their ideas about the proper method for breastfeeding, and tattling to your spouse about it. I am not sure where you live, but I have never lived anywhere with a shortage of churches. I think you could find somewhere more supportive of you as a human being. I am just stunned that that they would raise their voices at you for feeding you child!
post #15 of 116
their problem: SOCIETY (not God) has told them that breasts are sexual.

your problem: baby is likely to not appreciate the cover, i know mine doesn't. she fusses and fights if i try to cover. i only do so to latch her on when i'm in a highly crowded area, and then only if people are looking and *I* feel uncomfortable. additionally, covers draw MORE attention.

my solution: don't go back. i know that's easier said than done, especially if you are a member and this is your church family. otherwise, i'd let them know that you appreciate their concern but for your baby's comfort, covering is not feasible. i'd also nurse where ever i felt like it, but that's just me.

i guess you have two options: 1)conform and live with it, 2)nurse where/when you like and see exactly what they do to you.
post #16 of 116


I hope this gives you some inspiration that you're doing the right thing. Maybe you could even email for permission to print it off to send your pastors a copy so they won't end up harassing all the nursing mothers of the parish, or end up making them feel like they must choose between their babies and Church.

http://www.christopherwest.com/page.asp?ContentID=50
post #17 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by boobs4milk View Post
their problem: SOCIETY (not God) has told them that breasts are sexual.
Could not agree with this more. We do not attend church or follow any religion in particular, but I couldn't read this post and not comment. I would probably stop going, or if it were the only option, I would keep going and nurse my baby as I see fit.
post #18 of 116
I also wanted to add that you might want to bring up Matthew 5:28. That combined with all the good Biblical references to nursing, I think it's pretty clear that if anyone is in the wrong, it's those who look upon a nursing mother as though she's doing something dirty and sexual, and needs to cover up. You might even suggest to them that the sin is theirs, not yours.
post #19 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by RomanCarmelMom View Post


I hope this gives you some inspiration that you're doing the right thing. Maybe you could even email for permission to print it off to send your pastors a copy so they won't end up harassing all the nursing mothers of the parish, or end up making them feel like they must choose between their babies and Church.

http://www.christopherwest.com/page.asp?ContentID=50
I'm LDS not Catholic but that article was beautifully written.
post #20 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokering View Post
I simply don't think breastfeeding comes under that radar, period. Breastfeeding does not involve lascivious or sexual nudity: it is not an act calculated to excite lust or make husbands jealous or tempt church-going men's minds away from the sermon.
very well put!

Quote:
Originally Posted by annekh23 View Post
Tempting though it is to just leave, it would essentially prove their point that I am placing high priority on a single issue above and beyond other aspects of Christian and church life.
Are you willing to sacrifice this issue for "other aspects of Christian and church life" I wouldn't be. You can still be as devout as you ever were in your living room. More so even.

Going to the garage doesn't make you a car.....
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Lactivism
This thread is locked  
Mothering › Forums › Breastfeeding › Lactivism › Another bf in church situation