Yes, very odd slant put on the study. The conclusion of the published abstract is simply: "Maternal androgen levels in mid-pregnancy are negatively associated with breastfeeding."
As Mike Brady from Baby Milk Action so aptly puts it, a more appropriate headline might have been "Excess male hormone leads mothers to bottle feed and harms babies claims scientist."
Great response from the UNICEF Baby Friendly Initiative in the UK, taking issue with the author's claim that breastfed babies are only "slightly" healthier than formula-fed babies"
http://www.babyfriendly.org.uk/items...l.asp?item=620
Has anyone managed to see the original research paper yet? You need access to the journal, so I've only seen the abstract. I'm particularly interested in the funding, and what prompted Professor Carlsen to make such prepostorous claims about breastfeeding versus formula feeding when his research simply does not seem to back this up.
As Mike Brady from Baby Milk Action so aptly puts it, a more appropriate headline might have been "Excess male hormone leads mothers to bottle feed and harms babies claims scientist."
Great response from the UNICEF Baby Friendly Initiative in the UK, taking issue with the author's claim that breastfed babies are only "slightly" healthier than formula-fed babies"
http://www.babyfriendly.org.uk/items...l.asp?item=620
Has anyone managed to see the original research paper yet? You need access to the journal, so I've only seen the abstract. I'm particularly interested in the funding, and what prompted Professor Carlsen to make such prepostorous claims about breastfeeding versus formula feeding when his research simply does not seem to back this up.









.


