I don't remember seeing this study discussed on MDC - it has great implications for premature infants.
There has long been an argument in the NICU that breastfeeding takes too much energy and therefore premature babies must be bottle fed. This study seems to be a step on the way to disproving that. Resting energy after feeding was no different in bottle fed or breastfed infants, the opposite to what the authors expected when they began the study.
The abstract of the publication can be read for free here:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.or...ct/124/6/e1149
The authors' final conclusion is:
There has long been an argument in the NICU that breastfeeding takes too much energy and therefore premature babies must be bottle fed. This study seems to be a step on the way to disproving that. Resting energy after feeding was no different in bottle fed or breastfed infants, the opposite to what the authors expected when they began the study.
The abstract of the publication can be read for free here:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.or...ct/124/6/e1149
The authors' final conclusion is:
Quote:
| We speculate that it is safe to recommend feeding at the breast for infants born at >32 weeks when they can tolerate oral feeding. |









I just posted a link to the abstract on my Facebook page; I have many friends who are pregnant right now, I hope none of them end up with a NICU experience but if one of them does, hopefully they'll have read and remembered this article.
:
DS did 1000 times better when he was able to nurse on demand, but doctors like things to be easy to quantify and record.