Quote:
Originally Posted by North_Of_60 
Well, supposedly we KNOW he is part American Bulldog. The "mix" part, I suspect, was purposely kept vague because certain breeds aren't as adoptable. Like pits. His paperwork says "American Bulldog Mix". I guess time will tell. He's like 4 legged Kinder Surprise. Sans the chocolate. 
|
I just wanted to say that I wouldn't necessarily assume this is true. If the people who surrendered him owned the mother but don't know the father, and mom is an American Bulldog, then American Bulldog mix is an accurate descriptor. Shepherd mix or lab mix is common in my area, and its not because they think the other parent was a pitbull- they just have NO idea what the other parent was, but its obviously part shepherd or lab. Actually, I know some shelters that label EVERYTHING a "mix" even if its obviously purebred. They don't want the liability of having someone argue that the dog they adopted as a purebred turned out not to be, so they just label everything a mix. Shelter employees don't tend to be very good at identifying dog breeds anyway. I've seen common purebreds labeled as completely unrelated mixes (ie, say, an English setter labeled as a dalmation mix) or obvious mixes labeled as incredibly rare purebreds (say, the labradoodle that gets labeled as a Spinone Italiano)
At my shelter, when they're trying to avoid calling a pit bull a pit bull, they call it a "boxer mix" or if its the right color, a "lab mix" or sometimes just a "terrier mix" . So I might think the American Bulldog part is covering up pit ancestry, but not the mix part. Of course, I imagine both breeds look pretty similar at this age, so you're right, time will tell as he grows bigger.
