Yes, but look at Canada's largest national newspaper's take on the same issue:
Circumcision Health Benefit Virtually Nil, Study Finds
Little evidence that world's most common surgical procedure can prevent sexually transmitted infections, urinary tract infections and penile cancer
While it is the most common surgical procedure in the world, there is virtually no demonstrable health benefit derived from circumcision of either newborns or adults, a new study concludes.
It's an outstanding article, but I don't dare post any link here (cowering at the might of the mods)
Americans sometimes paint ourselves into a stubborn, isolationist corner on controversial issues where it seems we'd rather be independent than right, and infant circumcision is right there near the top of the list. The rest of the developed world must be wrong about RIC. Yeah, that's it.
(My father, from Madrid, used to recall with bemused incredulity a headline from when he was studying in England: Channel Underwater Cable Accidentally Severed; All of Europe is Incommunicado. Sort of sums up how the US sees circ: "US Circumcision Remains High; Rest of World at Risk of Living and Dying Horribly Diseased Existence".