Quote:
![]() I find that extremely hard to believe. How about prolonged labor or more need for instrumental delivery from the "nothing by mouth" rule (uh, running out of energy!) How about the increased discomfort from the deprivation? How about the increased fluid retention from delivering IV fluids instead of letting a woman hydrate <gasp> from drinking? How about the blood sugar drops of the baby? (from the IV glucose solution [or whatever it is] being given to the mama, & blood sugar subsequently dropping for both?) OK, I wrote the above, then I continued reading the article, here's the very next paragraph: Uh, but there is "no harm" from the restriction. WHAT THE ???????? How ironic that longer labor is considered a big problem, even with an official medical name, "Labor dystocia" that they give drugs to fix. But yet when longer labor is an iatrogenic, doctor-caused thing, it's "not considered harmful." ![]() |
I do think that next time I will be sneaking my own food in!!







???????? How ironic that longer labor is considered a big problem, even with an official medical name, "Labor dystocia" that they give drugs to fix. But yet when longer labor is an iatrogenic, doctor-caused thing, it's "not considered harmful." 