|Originally posted by SaveTheWild
Very good to know, thanks. He is particularly proud of his own "Coronal ridge" and is very concerned about passing it on... (OK, he is a little obsessed with it).
Wow- that's bizarre. How will he know... does he really expect that his baby will have a c@c* like his? It's going to be a little itty bitty baby penis... WHAT IF he doesn't have a c@c* like his dad? What if he is born with a teeny tiny micropenis... small even on the infantile penis standard? Would he have some sort of implant or something done to the baby? Is he going to ask his teenage son to show him an erection so thy can compare their coronal ridge? Is he going to mock the guy if his is not as impressive as dad thinks his own is? And what will he do if it's not? Or what if his son has one that's even BETTER (whatever THAT means) Doesn't he realise that sexual nerves are sexual nerves? That your penis is your penis and it's the only one you get? That a guy with a little tiny penis enjoys his penis just as much as a guy with a great big one? That your sexual pleasure is YOURS and not someone else's to control, destroy or manipulate?
That there isn't much you can o to change it (I'm talking size and shape)- so you have to work with what you have and that for him to presume that what he has is excuse me... GODS gift to women... is totally concieted and dumb? Yes... DUMB... sure he might have an impressive coronal ridge... that's his opinion... glad he likes it- but what does that have to do with anyone else? His son DOES inherit his penis from his father's genetic contribution.. that should be enough stroking for dad's ego there... not only does he inherit the penis... but also the FORESKIN which will be a pretty close approximation of his father's own foreskin which he ONCE posessed (and still posesses in every string of his own dna) until some other dude with a KNIFE decided to sexually violate him and hold his little baby unit in his hand and draw his own arbitrary line between the family jewels and the biohazard garbage... some dude went cutting on his fabulous unit... would he let some other dude walk up today and just go cutting on it however he wanted without him getting any say so? Then why is he so adamant about defending the arbitrary work someone did back then... does he even know he guy's name who left that scar on his c@c*?
Seriously since when was it cool for one dude to cut another dude's penis? Since when was it cool for one DUDE to say, I know just how much penis you can get by with and if you have any more than me- I will take it from you because I don't want you to have it. You can't have more than me because I have so much insecurity about myself that I am going to project it onto everone around me... either that or I am such an immature concieted full of myself meddling dominator that I can't imagine that other men can enjoy their sex organ without ME fixing it for them.
|OK, one maybe TMI question, if anyone knows... If the coronal ridge is exposed, does it stay that way throught intercourse, or does it get covered up by the foreskin as it is moved in and out? (Wow, this is turning into the penthouse forum or something... But this is a MAJOR issue for him, so anything I can use to help out is appreciated.)
Well- this TMI question is obviously not TMI if it's information that a person who is about to permenantly apply their own crippling standard onto someone else's body needs in order to BACK OFF.
It shows for one-an IGNORANCE of the FEMALE sexual response... and anatomy...http://health.discovery.com/centers/...ia/vagina.html
"The internal walls of the vagina itself do not have a great supply of nerve endings, thus are not very sensitive to touch. The outer one-third of the vagina, especially near the opening, contains nearly 90 percent of the vaginal nerve endings and therefore is much more sensitive to touch than the inner two-thirds of the vaginal barrel. "
Unless a couple were to conduct their intercourse in the outer third of the vagina... the coronal ridge is something that is pretty much not even being registered in female sexual perception... so the correct answer to the question is "not that it even matters" what IS being registered is the tapping of the glans on the cervix, the stretch of the muscles of the pelvic floor and the external stimulation of the clitoris.
As for your question... it all depends on how the person wants to have sex- he could have sex in a way that his glans stayed covered most of the time, or he colld do it so it was exposed most of the time... however he wants... however he likes... it's HIS perogative...
...unless his father was to barge in the room in the middle of getting down and dirty with some hottie and say, "Hey there son, I noticed that a little bit of your foreskin might be folding over your glans there on the outstroke and I don't like that one bit, no sir-eee son I don't like that at ALL- stopwhat you are doing right away or i WILL HAVE TO HOLD YOUR SHAFT SKIN TAUGHT WITH MY OWN HAND! i MUST HAVE TOTAL control over the way your penis skin moves while you have sex or I will be extremely upset! If your glans is not exposed 100% of the time while your penis is inside that girl's body I march you right down to Dr. Likestoslice and cut off half of your penis skin... YOU MUST preform exactly HOW I do... that is the DUTY of a son... It is my duty as a father to be SURE you comply- this is our family tradition!!"
Is that REALLY what your husband would be like in terms of your son's sexuality... because that's what we are talking about here.
When he puts HIS scar on his son's penis--- it's like keeping his hand there for the rest of that guy's life... a way of sexually controling that boy no matter where he is... even after his father is dead and gone- Dad will still have his grip on it- keeping that shaft skin tight.
I never used a "vaginacam" to spy on the unfurling action of a lover's foreskin when we were in the middle of intercourse... would it really matter? No... whatever it was that was happening- felt good. And I never felt like I had been rubbed raw when my lover was intact. That's because of the muscles of the vaginal floor, hugging on the base of the penis- there was still some movement there for the full length of the stroke- like nature designed it to work. Circumcision has a most definate negative effect of adding abrasive friction into the mix of other very pleasurable sensations.
Circumcision, by destroying the NORMAL sexual function of providing a movable sheath of skin which buffers the abrasion between the vagina and erectile tissue of the penis... will shift an unnaturally large responsibility of sexual comfort and function on to the FEMALE lubriation ability... you will notice that the Discovery article devoted almost half of their description of the female sex organ into a description of how females sexually malfunction by not being able to physically COMPENSATE for the unnatural immobility of the sex organ of their circumcised partrners... DUH- wake up America... it's not that women are frigid... it's that some DOCTOR- messed with a guys penis and has shifted an abnormal expectation onto a woman to compensate for American men are now sexually lacking.
"I would gladly cut your baby today, and sell his wife some Avlamil tomorrow."
Ask your husband to figure out how people, FATHERS, were buying the original anti masturbation hysteria that cutting off a forskin would stop masturbation... I'm sure he thinks the whole idea is absurd, that he can't imagine that HE has been crippled or hindered in any way... but how was it these other men even BOUGHT that idea? What did they know about having a foreskin and masturbating with one- that they could even IMAGINE that cutting it off would totally ruin a guy's enjoyment of touching himself?http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/
1888"A remedy for masturbation which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision. The operation should be performed without administering anesthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutory effect upon the mind, especially, if it is connected with the idea of punishment, as it may well be in some cases."
John Harvey Kellog, creator of the Corn Flake, Treatment for Self-Abuse and Its Effects, Plain Facts for Old and Young," Burlington, Iowa: P. Segner & Co. 1888, p. 295."