I live in Massachusetts, and my small town hospital has just recently banned VBACS! I have had both of my children there, and I do not want to go anywhere else. It is like a birth center, it is where I have my babies, and I just don't want the right taken away from me. I am so frustrated. I delivered my son by emergency c-section in 2004, and my daughter by a VBAC in 2007, awesome, amazing, perfect. Now that VBACs are banned, I am just hoping that something will change by July.
In the likely event that it doesn't, I am at a loss. My insurance only covers births in MA, so I am confined to this state, and the c-section rates just are not good around here. I feel like I will end up having to leave my small town hospital just to drive much too far to a hospital where it is basically predetermined that I will end up with a c-section. South Shore Hospital had a c-section rate of 44% in 2007, and I can only imagine that this # has gone up since then, the way things are these days.
Can a hospital that bans VBACS really FORCE you to have a c-section if you come in and you are not ready to push? It is my understanding that they cannot force you to have major surgery...now, with the "de facto ban" one is able to simply sign a wiaver...I don't understand, and would love it if anyone could explain it to me, why I couldn't just do the same thing even with the ban. I will sign any and all documents saying that I will not sue!
In the likely event that it doesn't, I am at a loss. My insurance only covers births in MA, so I am confined to this state, and the c-section rates just are not good around here. I feel like I will end up having to leave my small town hospital just to drive much too far to a hospital where it is basically predetermined that I will end up with a c-section. South Shore Hospital had a c-section rate of 44% in 2007, and I can only imagine that this # has gone up since then, the way things are these days.Can a hospital that bans VBACS really FORCE you to have a c-section if you come in and you are not ready to push? It is my understanding that they cannot force you to have major surgery...now, with the "de facto ban" one is able to simply sign a wiaver...I don't understand, and would love it if anyone could explain it to me, why I couldn't just do the same thing even with the ban. I will sign any and all documents saying that I will not sue!









