treating the acute as it comes up... that's comparable to what we say with FEs, right? the peeling the onion? vs. finding the constitutional and treating with that...... coffee's not working too well this morning for some reason, lol.... but i think that was the thing i wanted to say but couldnt. unearthing deeper layers by treating what comes up as it does.... is a *great* way to figure stuff out.... you're not, though, getting at a "new," "more true," miasm.... but rather getting closer to your ONE??? is that fair to say? (stopped in the middle and made more coffee.... lol.)
might be an issue of semantics....but you never get closer to the miasm (if you're asking me.) It's always there and it is what it is. If you're talking about your constitutional, that would be different. I also think I may have confused the issue here. Sorry about that. I don't know how many FE practitioners really do look for the "constitutional." Because of my love of homeopathy, and because the type remedies are a concept set forth by Bach, it's how I see things. Not every one would. I would think it's fair to say that most treat what's in front of them. The more intuitive they are the deeper they can get in terms of zeroing in the actual issue (vs. how it's presenting) but most aren't looking for "the one." Most classical homeopaths are.
back to the mundane......any suggestions for cell salts (or something else) to help with a ridiculous tendency to get really nasty ingrown hairs? (in addition to exfoliating. he knows he should and sometimes does but then lapses. i told him i'd ask.....)
agree with both the silica and the vitamin C.