Quote:
| that particular part of it didn't sit well with me, and really negatively affected the way the rest of the article came across to me. |
Thanks for clarifying.
I agree with some of what she says. Her concept is similar to attachment parenting in many ways. Keeping your infant close, preferably in contact, not letting them cio, breast feeding on demand, etc. But she takes it a slightly different direction in the way you interact with your baby/toddler.
Some things that might work when you live in a tribe in the jungle just aren't compatible with the average modern life style.
I do agree that you can give your kids too much control and that this doesn't make for healthy family. Kids do need boundaries. They need someone to be the parent, someone they can look to who is in charge.
The above is all based on my limited understanding of the continuum concept, and therefore could be totally off base, lol.
I am having some difficulty finding that happy medium between being The Parent, in charge and in control, and being loving and understanding of my baby's baby ways.
When she hits me in the face and pulls my hair because she is mad (this is a recent development) what do I do to stop that behavior? What started it in the first place? Something is frustrating her, but I don't know what. And I can't just ignore it and let her do it. (ouch) Telling her, firmly, to stop, doesn't seem to have any effect at all.
The continuum concept seems to imply that if I had followed attachment parenting correctly (I know she doesn't call it that, but that is what it boils down to) I wouldn't be having this problem at all. I did/do my best. I really don't know what piece of the puzzle I am missing here.
I'm not tying to hijack this thread, I'm just thinking out loud. Or in type.
