hrrmm...that's very possible! I was sick from CD12-22 (it felt as though it dragged on forever). Actually, my CM supports that idea too- it was EWCM up until CD22. If that's the case, that would mean that I'm now only 13DPO now. Maybe I'll be paid a visit by tomorrow?
I really don't want to test. If it were -ve I'd still have doubts and be confused and if it were +ve it would just be too real and I'm not sure I'd want to tell DH right now and having that concrete evidence would just make it hard. I'm more in the "wait and see" frame of mind. DH would not be a happy camper (since he's supposed to be starting school in the fall and I'm supposed to become the primary breadwinner so that he CAN do that).
I've been feeling crampy for days with nothing to show for it. I'll just keep on keeping on and entertain the idea of a CD22 O for a while. It's really quite plausable.
I really don't think the rise on CD26 is significant, 'cause those higher temps just don't reflect my typical pre-O temps at all and I was feeling better by then, so there's no reason to think they'd still be elevated if O hadn't already happened. I'm really liking this O'ing during higher temps theory since it does better reflect my CF and cervix positioning even better than the original spike on CD19 which was likely due to a fever.
Thanks so much for your input ladies. I appologize for all the randomness and crazy un-clear details. Maybe next time I'll just scan my paper chart...lol...
I really don't want to test. If it were -ve I'd still have doubts and be confused and if it were +ve it would just be too real and I'm not sure I'd want to tell DH right now and having that concrete evidence would just make it hard. I'm more in the "wait and see" frame of mind. DH would not be a happy camper (since he's supposed to be starting school in the fall and I'm supposed to become the primary breadwinner so that he CAN do that).
I've been feeling crampy for days with nothing to show for it. I'll just keep on keeping on and entertain the idea of a CD22 O for a while. It's really quite plausable.
I really don't think the rise on CD26 is significant, 'cause those higher temps just don't reflect my typical pre-O temps at all and I was feeling better by then, so there's no reason to think they'd still be elevated if O hadn't already happened. I'm really liking this O'ing during higher temps theory since it does better reflect my CF and cervix positioning even better than the original spike on CD19 which was likely due to a fever.
Thanks so much for your input ladies. I appologize for all the randomness and crazy un-clear details. Maybe next time I'll just scan my paper chart...lol...









is late when before it was only 4. The thing to keep in mind with that is that is based on a 14 day lp so 5 days before


, it was just a very very weak one. I know there is no real difference between annovulatory or ovulatory since I can't use the first 5 days rule either way.........do you think I am still just wonky from nursing and fertility returning? (I just weaned my LO - hasn't nursed for about 3 days now)
Follow Mothering