I'm ashamed of my past ignorance about this and even more fearful of your responses, but I need to know.
I broke a mercury thermometer when ds1 was 3 and vacuumed it up (!!) without any ventilation in winter in his bedroom, another when he was 4 (this time I knew to pick up the pieces and not vaccum, although I did eventually vacuum his room), then I broke one of those new fluorescent light bulbs in the living room when he was 5 and vacuumed it up (before I knew they contained any mercury) without ventilating.
My ds1 is 8. When he was younger (as in before he was about 3 or 3.5) he was extremely bright. He learned very easily and could do 40 signs by age 1.5 and could recognize the whole alphabet at 2.5 - and lots more, but that's enough. Since then, he's struggled learning very basic things, although he hasn't been diagnosed with a learning disability. I think he's absolutely wonderful, but he's far from what I would consider 'bright'. I'm not saying that he'd be better if he were 'smarter', but I just say this to explain my concern. His younger brother is extremely bright and learns very, very easily (please don't take this as me thinking ds2 is better... that's not it at all!)
Is there any possibility that ds1 had some level of mercury poisoning? I honestly lay awake at night feeling horribly guilty. I haven't been able to even suggest this to my dh.
I hope I'm blowing this WAY out of proportion, but what I've read suggests that I might not be.
Any insight on this?
Thank you in advance.
I broke a mercury thermometer when ds1 was 3 and vacuumed it up (!!) without any ventilation in winter in his bedroom, another when he was 4 (this time I knew to pick up the pieces and not vaccum, although I did eventually vacuum his room), then I broke one of those new fluorescent light bulbs in the living room when he was 5 and vacuumed it up (before I knew they contained any mercury) without ventilating.
My ds1 is 8. When he was younger (as in before he was about 3 or 3.5) he was extremely bright. He learned very easily and could do 40 signs by age 1.5 and could recognize the whole alphabet at 2.5 - and lots more, but that's enough. Since then, he's struggled learning very basic things, although he hasn't been diagnosed with a learning disability. I think he's absolutely wonderful, but he's far from what I would consider 'bright'. I'm not saying that he'd be better if he were 'smarter', but I just say this to explain my concern. His younger brother is extremely bright and learns very, very easily (please don't take this as me thinking ds2 is better... that's not it at all!)
Is there any possibility that ds1 had some level of mercury poisoning? I honestly lay awake at night feeling horribly guilty. I haven't been able to even suggest this to my dh.
I hope I'm blowing this WAY out of proportion, but what I've read suggests that I might not be.
Any insight on this?
Thank you in advance.










