I have always suspected that my dad might be intact due to where he was born and the time frame. I have never asked about him specifically but my mom has brought it up in almost every circ discussion we have had that he was so I just let it go.Well dad is now undergoing treatment for prostate cancer
and mom was showing me one of his papers from the urologist where he had a bladder scan done. On that paper "phimosis" is checkmarked. So that means that he was not circed.I am 99.9% sure that you can only have phimosis if you have the whole foreskin (someone correct me if I am wrong) since in an adult man the sphincter is to tight to allow for retraction.
Mom did say that when they first got married it looked like he was circed ie no foreskin on the glans but now as he has aged it looks different and he does have coverage.
I actually started laughing knowing that he was probably intact because it just goes to show how the intact penis is a non issue because he has never had a single problem in that regard.
It is hard for me to understand how you couldnt know if it was intact or not since in all the photo's I have seen there is no doubt. The only one irl I have seen are my dh and ds and you can definatly tell the difference.
I know there is a variation of normal from very short foreskin to a lot of over hang but still it is hard for me to wrap my head around being that intamate with someone for over 30 yrs without noticing something.







