Quote:
| IMHO there are MANY other works of quality literature that speak to various times in history and have much less misunderstanding attached to them. |
Those misunderstandings are a very good reason to have at least a passing familiarity with the Bible.
I remember a lecturer at Uni who had us read a story that was a retelling of the story of Lot and his daughters (a rather icky incest piece from Genesis). She insisted it was a "feminist retelling" because in the retelling, Lot's daughters made the decision to sleep with their father to get children, whereas "in the Biblical story, of course, they were raped by their father". I was the only one in a class of 40+ students who seemed to know that wasn't the case... and when I pointed out that no, the retelling actually followed the Biblical story point-for-point on that score, she refused to believe me. That incident solidified a growing disgust I had at her teaching methods - not that everyone needs to know the story of Lot and his daughters, of course, but if one is going to be teaching literature that relates to the Bible (even much less directly than in my example), one should
know the freaking source material.
I can't imagine studying American slavery without knowing the Biblical justifications used for it and whether or not they were an accurate representation on the Bible's stance on the matter... or studying Darwin and the history of evolution without having read Genesis 1-3... or reading Toni Morrison's Beloved without knowing the significance of the title... or studying LOTR without bringing up Tolkien's Catholicism... or, or, or! Biblical themes, language and concepts inform SO much of Western literature. You don't have to like it or approve of it, but you do have to acknowledge it - and critique it, if you like - to really engage with thousands of books, plays, movies and songs. Think how many references you miss in life if you haven't seen
Star Wars, and then multiply that by a million.
