Mothering › Forums › Education › Learning at Home and Beyond › How much does my first grader need to know about history?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

How much does my first grader need to know about history?

post #1 of 18
Thread Starter 
We've mostly been covering history through literature or as it comes up. I'm trying to kind of follow "What your first grader needs to know". So we've covered the Stone Age, Ancient Egypt, Ancient China, early Native American of our state and are covering Ancient Rome and then Ancient Greece. We covered Thanksgiving and MLK day and the related history as they came up.

Usually we read a couple of books, both fiction and nonfiction, and watch a film or documentary, if appropriate. We talk about where the country is located on the map and maybe visit a museum. Sometimes, we do a craft (he hates crafts) or go out to eat restaurant of the country we studied.

So for example of Ancient Egypt; we read "Mummies in the Morning" from the Magic Tree house series. We read some nonfiction books like "You wouldn't want to be a Pyramid builder" and Linda Bailey's "Good Times Travel agency" books. He also watched a couple of documentaries.

Basically, he can locate Egypt on the map. He knows about the Nile river and why it was important. He knows the Egyptians built the pyramids, made mummies, wrote in hieroglyphics, and had Pharaohs. He can recognize some art and pictures as "Egyptians", he has a vague sense of the time line, "before the Romans and after the Stone Age and dinosaurs." He made connections between Egyptians, Romans and Greeks owning slaves and how that is related the American Civil war. He does spend a lot of time trying to figure out who the good guys are. How much does a 7 year old need to know?
post #2 of 18
We are using FIAR and homemade unit studies for our first grade and doing more "social studies" vs only history. We cover some history, so far it has been mainly American(MKD, Native Americans, life before TV , etc). We also learned about several countries/states, located them on the map, learned different facts about them (climate, famous land marks etc.), We have learned a little about community helpers (this sounds so preschool, but my first grader has learned new information from this, like what the water company does etc.). I have an astronomy unit planned soon and we will learns about NASA, astronauts, and the space race with that. That type of thing, both my first grader and my preschooler have really enjoyed most of what we have studied so far.
post #3 of 18
It sounds like your 7 year old knows way more about history than most 7 year olds. I don't think a first grader actually needs to know anything at all about history, except maybe just that things in the past were different than things today - that there was a time when people didn't have computers or cars, for instance, and before that a time when there were no people. IMO, anything beyond that is cool if you and your kid are interested in it, but not necessary. I don't think there would be any harm in letting your kid reach high school age with essentially no knowledge of history, as long as he had some curiosity about it by then, and some interest in learning more.
post #4 of 18
We are doing first grade history as well, following a 4-year rotation method. So our coverage sounds just like yours, except I do not have the What Your First Grader Needs to Know. We follow Story of the World and the suggested literature and non-fiction books, with videos and activities. We just went to a museum yesterday. Sounds like we do all the same things, but we might do a few more crafts, my daughter and I enjoy them.

So far we've only covered prehistory and Ancient Egypt. At 5 years, she is thrilled! She draws maps with Egypt and the Nile and can point them out on a globe/map. She memorized hieroglyphs, and we'll be making mummies and pyramids this weekend. We haven't gotten to other ancient civilizations yet, but she keeps asking what's next - Greeks or Romans.

We're just starting to do history officially, but we also covered MLK and will continue to cover holidays like that as the year progresses.

I think you're doing great, well actually, beyond great!
post #5 of 18
Check it off your list! Your first grader knows plenty. For my own reality checks I look at what our local school does. In first grade, they have 3 units for social studies. One was on farms, one was about family, and one was about our community. Sure, they briefly touch on actual history around certain events. . . "Thanksgiving" led to learning about Columbus & the first thanksgiving. If I kept her in school, MLK day would have led to brief information about him and prejudice etc. Oh, and the first grade classrooms get a student from Japan for about a month--these are adult students that come to reinforce their English skills--they teach the first graders bits about Japan.

That is it for the first graders at our local school.

Amy
post #6 of 18
I will have to disagree with the way public schools do history, teaching it non-chronologically. I loved learning and got straight A's in school, but history was one subject I hated. I do not remember anything I learned from school regarding any kind of history.

One thing I love about the neoclassical method, is teaching history chronologically. We'll be doing Ancients this year, Middle Ages the next, Early Modern/Renaissance, and then Modern the fourth year. And then repeat, getting more in depth. And repeat once again. While we study Ancients, we'll be exploring literature and arts of the time, music, architecture, and even foods! What a way to learn in a memorable way that instills a love of history!

History is important to help us understand the world, and so history will be an important subject for us.
post #7 of 18
Thread Starter 
OP here, thanks for the answers. I happen to love history and how it relates to the world today, especially how many of the issues today (wars, politics, cultural ties) have roots in the past. DS is interested more in science, but is willing to learn history if I can tie it to science.

My family and others have suggested I over teach certain things. I think my mother was a little weirded out when my six year old asked "Why does Scooby doo have enemies, but Harry Potter has a nemesis?" He clearly likes to think about things and I want to encourage that for him.
post #8 of 18
One thing I read somewhere (no idea where now) made a lot of sense to me - basically, that in the early years, the most important thing to teach about science & history when children are young is love of learning/inquiry around those subjects. So that if your kid was asked, do you like history/science, they'd respond with a resounding Yes!! That way when they get older, they'll be enthusiastic about learning these subjects.

My dd loved birds when she was two, she studied the field guides and could identify ~25 or 30 birds, in the book and IRL of those she could see in our yard/travels. Can she id that many now? I doubt it. Same thing with dinosaurs, she studied the guides and the year she was three she could id way more than 25 dinosaurs. That dropped away too though. So I think, to a certain extent, what we teach isn't as important as offering material that is exciting to children in a way that is exciting to them. And that's fairly individual.

The other thing I've come across, I think in the Well-Trained Mind book, is that the early-elem age children are such sponges and it's a good time to build a framework. You know how when you learn a new word or hear about a new place, and that new word/place comes up again & again? I've seen that happen with my kids all the time - they learn about a new place or idea and then are able to connect with it when they hear it again, instead of letting it pass over themselves, unrecognized.

So, that's the background on why we do lots of geography games (my kids love it, and I think it's good connect-the-dots info), and also some Story of the World and then add in whatever their interests are for history. We are pretty unschool-y around science because they have so many interests to pursue, astronomy, geology, physical science etc.
post #9 of 18
I didn't want anyone to think that I agreed with the ps approach to history! I just thought the op wanted to know what was "needed" in regards to history. I was trying to put her mind at ease by offering up the ps example. So, if her child was resisting the history, she could "check it off" her list for now and revisit later--he was not behind.

Amy
post #10 of 18
Interesting discussion - just the other night my DH, who teaches 8th grade history in PS, and I were talking about how we'd homeschool history, science, etc., and he said elementary teachers have told him they feel they have very little time for anything but literacy and math skills, basically the 3Rs. So as much as DH believes in his work, he's thrilled to think our children will get so much more of the rich "other stuff," including the history he loves

Anyway, so OP, yes, sounds likes you're doing great!
post #11 of 18
it sounds like your child is doing wonderful. i personlly do not teach history in chronological order, and i feel it isn't necessary in the younger years. currently, we enjoy literature for studying time periods, traditions, cultures, etc. for history, we are reading the little house series & doing a lot of go-along activities. my daughter also loves biographies, so we check those out a lot as well. for geography, we enjoy rod & staff second grade curriculum (which is also literature based). hth. no worries, mama.
post #12 of 18
I plan on giving my dd an overview of the American and Native American history then moving into culture studies and history of the cultures we study. I think that history is a nice enrichment area (and enrichment is important to me), but it doesn't have a lot of practical application for most job fields so I am not going to try to cover everything in depth unless she actually wants to. I think culture studies and understanding other societies so you can work with a variety of people is much more important.
post #13 of 18
I don't know, though, I think it has quite a bit of practical value in regards to citizenship, understanding world events, etc...
post #14 of 18
Thread Starter 
Thanks for the replies, OP here. My parents considered reading, history, and the ability to discuss current events and politics very important from a fairly young age. I remember being expected to have an opinion on the presidential election when I was eight. It's interesting hear other people's ideas and thoughts.
post #15 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by NightOwlwithowlet View Post
Thanks for the replies, OP here. My parents considered reading, history, and the ability to discuss current events and politics very important from a fairly young age. I remember being expected to have an opinion on the presidential election when I was eight. It's interesting hear other people's ideas and thoughts.
i think current events should be discussed from a young age, so i agree with your parents. my daughter voted this past election, as there was a kid's ballot for her to fill out. history should be integrated into daily conversations for sure. for me though, using a specific scope & sequence in first grade just isn't necessary. i don't feel i'm doing my second grader an injustice at all by using living books & biographies. she still knows more than any public school peer, ykwim?
post #16 of 18
I like the idea of the 4 yr cycle when they are older. Doing only 2 cycles. For younger elementary, I would just rather just do a hodgepodge.

Angela I read your blog on ancient Egypt I'm going to be stealing a few of those ideas when we cover Egypt.
post #17 of 18
Not exactly addressing your question, because I agree with the pp's -- you've already covered a lot of ground.

One suggestion, though -- a time line is really, really helpful to my dc's when we are discussing anything historic - be it 25 years ago, or 250 years ago, or 25,000 years ago. It gives them a visual perspective on time and history (and frankly, it helps me keep some events straight!) We have a 15 ft. time line that we pull out and lay on the floor. I know that some people keep their time lines up on a wall.

ETA: Oops - I guess ours is 20'. I went to see if I could link you to the product we have, but it looks like it's discontinued and going to be updated.
http://www.pandiapress.com/timeline.html
post #18 of 18
I wouldn't even know how to type out what we've studied/learned at this point (dd is nearly 7). Honestly, we just grab various books that seem interesting and start reading. And if she is more interested in a subject, we'll go further in that area. We just read a book about Anne Frank's life, and she was really interested in it, so we'll probably go in search of more - and possibly stuff about the war at that time, Germany, the Netherlands. I love not feeling like we're on a "schedule" of what we have to do and when. And I cannot tell you how much I love learning right along with her. Once I started letting go of worrying what I was "supposed" to be teaching her, it all of a sudden became so much more enjoyable for us. We love reading children's biographies of various people. Those tend to be a great stepping off place! The library is our friend, for sure! I love that I can take out as many as I want at one time, and that they accept online reservations (and will bring in books from all over Hawaii). It's such a thrill for me to go to the library and have a stack of goodies waiting for me at the desk!!!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Learning at Home and Beyond
Mothering › Forums › Education › Learning at Home and Beyond › How much does my first grader need to know about history?