Hello my name is Janette and I'm still sorta new here. I'm working towards my associate's degree in Early Childhood Education. Throughout some of my classes I had to observe at some day care centers. I have a major concern about some nap time teqniques this one NAEYC accredited center had.....
I had went to the center one day to observe the infant room. The first day I got there I saw an older infant boy sleeping in the arms of the teacher during nap time. My first thought was of how sweet that looked. But then on another day I saw what truely had taken place before the baby boy fell asleep.....
During nap time the infants were required to be put down for a nap and the baby boy didn't want to take a nap. They didn't put him in his crib because they said he would cry non-stop. So instead they held him. At first I saw it as good thing because of the fact that they didn't leave him alone to cry it out. But then I saw the baby protest with all of his strength. He was crying out "Mommy!" and struggling non-stop to get out of the arms of the teacher. He finally fell asleep after about 20-30 minutes of pure exhaustion from the struggle. During this whole struggle the teacher held him very close against her body as if smothering him, which I believe made the baby even more angry. I was very shocked when I saw this and my instincts told me that this was very wrong. I didn't understand why they couldn't have had him sit down instead of smothering him and maybe help him fall asleep by reading a book to him?
I would like to know what other people think of this and if their techniques are wrong like my instincts told me or not? Thanks, Janette
I had went to the center one day to observe the infant room. The first day I got there I saw an older infant boy sleeping in the arms of the teacher during nap time. My first thought was of how sweet that looked. But then on another day I saw what truely had taken place before the baby boy fell asleep.....
During nap time the infants were required to be put down for a nap and the baby boy didn't want to take a nap. They didn't put him in his crib because they said he would cry non-stop. So instead they held him. At first I saw it as good thing because of the fact that they didn't leave him alone to cry it out. But then I saw the baby protest with all of his strength. He was crying out "Mommy!" and struggling non-stop to get out of the arms of the teacher. He finally fell asleep after about 20-30 minutes of pure exhaustion from the struggle. During this whole struggle the teacher held him very close against her body as if smothering him, which I believe made the baby even more angry. I was very shocked when I saw this and my instincts told me that this was very wrong. I didn't understand why they couldn't have had him sit down instead of smothering him and maybe help him fall asleep by reading a book to him?
I would like to know what other people think of this and if their techniques are wrong like my instincts told me or not? Thanks, Janette
















