Exactly 2 weeks before he turns 3, everything is falling apart for Connor's transition from Early Intervention to public schools.
On Friday, everything was moving ahead smoothly (although frustratingly slow) and now today I get a phone call that it's all changing, and NOT IN A GOOD WAY EITHER.
The short version is that they had agreed to send him out of district to a neighboring district that has a preschool classroom with a full time signing interpreter. The class is total communication, meaning that everything is done both verbally and in sign, the teacher signs, the parapro signs, the other kids (both hearing and hearing impaired) sign.
Instead, our local school district wants to hire an interpreter for him so he can attend school here. Which is great, except it means he can only talk to ONE person in the class.
The problem? They are officially meeting the law this way. They are providing him necessary services this way. I can argue all day long that the other program is a better fit for him, but they can (and are) argue that what they're offering is "adequate" as per the law.
So we have a meeting with the Director of Special Education Services on Friday afternoon. First thing I'm going to ask is how they can justify the cost of hiring someone only for him when there is a program already existing elsewhere. I'm also going to argue that this does not meet his social/emotional needs. I'm also going to argue that his verbal speech progression is actually BETTER with sign and when he's in a fully verbal and sign environment.
I'm just so angry right now...it looks like we're heading down the road towards an appeal and/or fair rights hearing. I'm not going to drop it, he needs to be at the other school, and I'll fight whatever I have to to get him there.
I only have 2 weeks to do it though.
On Friday, everything was moving ahead smoothly (although frustratingly slow) and now today I get a phone call that it's all changing, and NOT IN A GOOD WAY EITHER.
The short version is that they had agreed to send him out of district to a neighboring district that has a preschool classroom with a full time signing interpreter. The class is total communication, meaning that everything is done both verbally and in sign, the teacher signs, the parapro signs, the other kids (both hearing and hearing impaired) sign.
Instead, our local school district wants to hire an interpreter for him so he can attend school here. Which is great, except it means he can only talk to ONE person in the class.
The problem? They are officially meeting the law this way. They are providing him necessary services this way. I can argue all day long that the other program is a better fit for him, but they can (and are) argue that what they're offering is "adequate" as per the law.
So we have a meeting with the Director of Special Education Services on Friday afternoon. First thing I'm going to ask is how they can justify the cost of hiring someone only for him when there is a program already existing elsewhere. I'm also going to argue that this does not meet his social/emotional needs. I'm also going to argue that his verbal speech progression is actually BETTER with sign and when he's in a fully verbal and sign environment.
I'm just so angry right now...it looks like we're heading down the road towards an appeal and/or fair rights hearing. I'm not going to drop it, he needs to be at the other school, and I'll fight whatever I have to to get him there.
I only have 2 weeks to do it though.











I think I majorly intimidated her, so hopefully she now goes to the Director and warns her that a lion of a mama is going to be in that room tomorrow. 