
Why not approve it for babies. They could get the shot along with the hep b at birth. Afterall, many women have HPV infections and don't know it. They could spread this to the baby when it goes through the birth canal

I am not surprised by this at all. This just means more money for merck. But what I really don't understand is that in the original trials, I remember reading that the reason that it was only approved to women under 27 is that MOST women have been exposed to some form of HPV by that age and their immune system takes care of the infection by itself. AND that the vaccine can actually INCREASE the risk of cancer in women who have already had HPV, regardless of the strain. I will try and find it and post if I have time, but I distinctly remember reading this, so this reccomendation to give it to basically all women under age 45 could actually be quite dangerous.
Follow Mothering