My EDD based on first PP AF is 8/26, but I believe I was going to have a LOOONG cycle, due to EBF..didn't see any fertility signs. So, I'm going with more like the first of Sept. Anyway, that puts me in the 12.5-13.5 weeks pg range.
About 2 weeks ago, I could already feel my fundus well above the pubic bone. When my bladder was full at that time, it was higher. In the past several days, it has now reached, oh..I'd say just slightly below my naval. Somewhere in the 18 week range. When standing (and I've compared all my prenatal pics) I look the same as I usually do about 6 months pregnant. With the exception of my 3rd baby, who was transverse, I usually measure about dead on, until the end, when I measure a bit bigger and have bigger babies.
I realize measuring bigger at the end is a fluctuation on position and individual size of mama and babe. However, measuring bigger in 1st and early 2nd trimester is usually a result of 1) misdating, 2) multiples, or 3) some other issue like a fibroid or diabetes, or polyhydraminos (rare early on)
At 7 weeks I had a really fast in-OB office old school u/s to rule out ectopic pregnancy as I've had tubal surgery. So I'm sure of my dates. He quickly found a little baby and heartbeat, and yolk sac, and turned off the machine. I'd say about 1 minute..which is all I needed..
My midwife is now going to order me an u/s to make sure there is only one baby, and check on things. She says that twins are missed more often than we think on u/s, prior to 10 weeks-particularly the quick in office scans.
Any of you have any experience with this? I have 5 other children, so I get that my uterus would be more compliant with expansion, LOL! I'm not a big girl, but not skin and bones, either. The "I look huge" argument only goes so far, as we all carry differently. I know it gets rather annoying to hear pregnant mom's say, "I'm so big!" when they look tiny, so I'm seriously not worried about how I look...I'm talking real uterine size here. So, while I look like I usually do at 6+ months, I'm LESS concerned about that than where my uterus actually is.
Any mama's with a fundal height several weeks bigger for known dates? Any of you had this in the past and had twins or some other issue? Any missed twins on early u/s? (I'm a very realistic mom, and twins are welcome but not a novelty I would be naive over risks, difficulties, etc) I know the u/s will let us know for sure, but it's nice to throw ideas around with other mama's.
Thanks and hope you are all feeling great!
About 2 weeks ago, I could already feel my fundus well above the pubic bone. When my bladder was full at that time, it was higher. In the past several days, it has now reached, oh..I'd say just slightly below my naval. Somewhere in the 18 week range. When standing (and I've compared all my prenatal pics) I look the same as I usually do about 6 months pregnant. With the exception of my 3rd baby, who was transverse, I usually measure about dead on, until the end, when I measure a bit bigger and have bigger babies.
I realize measuring bigger at the end is a fluctuation on position and individual size of mama and babe. However, measuring bigger in 1st and early 2nd trimester is usually a result of 1) misdating, 2) multiples, or 3) some other issue like a fibroid or diabetes, or polyhydraminos (rare early on)
At 7 weeks I had a really fast in-OB office old school u/s to rule out ectopic pregnancy as I've had tubal surgery. So I'm sure of my dates. He quickly found a little baby and heartbeat, and yolk sac, and turned off the machine. I'd say about 1 minute..which is all I needed..
My midwife is now going to order me an u/s to make sure there is only one baby, and check on things. She says that twins are missed more often than we think on u/s, prior to 10 weeks-particularly the quick in office scans.
Any of you have any experience with this? I have 5 other children, so I get that my uterus would be more compliant with expansion, LOL! I'm not a big girl, but not skin and bones, either. The "I look huge" argument only goes so far, as we all carry differently. I know it gets rather annoying to hear pregnant mom's say, "I'm so big!" when they look tiny, so I'm seriously not worried about how I look...I'm talking real uterine size here. So, while I look like I usually do at 6+ months, I'm LESS concerned about that than where my uterus actually is.
Any mama's with a fundal height several weeks bigger for known dates? Any of you had this in the past and had twins or some other issue? Any missed twins on early u/s? (I'm a very realistic mom, and twins are welcome but not a novelty I would be naive over risks, difficulties, etc) I know the u/s will let us know for sure, but it's nice to throw ideas around with other mama's.
Thanks and hope you are all feeling great!







. Oh, well.
I am very certain of that.
Follow Mothering