DD, 16 months, usually Bf's once in the night usually around 3/4am (that's if everything's right in her world - if she's ill/teething/otherwise unsettled, she might wake quite a few more times and bf). A friend said to me today that by continuing to feed her, I'm preventing her from learning to self-settle and get enough uninterrupted sleep through the night, to her detriment. And then quoted one of her other friends, whose 13 year old wakes every night for a glass of water (which she gets herself
) essentially saying that that will be DD's "fate" if I continue feeding her at night. Now I'm not planning to fully nightwean her at the moment - I consider her partially night-weaned as I followed the Jay Gordon plan when she was about 10 months, in desperation, and now she often only wakes once. But is there any actual evidence, either way, that toddlers need 11/12 hours uninterrupted sleep, and that being fed in the night will lead to long term sleep issues for her?
I said in this conversation that one reason I'm not planning to nightwean is because now I work part-time, on two days a week I only see her for 30 mins a day
so the night feed gives me a bit more DD time. She replied that I was obviously doing it for me then, not for DD - how can I say that although yes I do it for me (is that really so wrong, to want to snuggle and connect with my baby
if it doesn't harm her?), I think DD also gets some benefit from extra mummy milk in the night when I've been away all day. I don't really want answers to this last bit as I'm rambling but just wanted to share my thoughts. The emotional connection *for the child* is underestimated I think, particularly by people who haven't bf'd for any length of time and who therefore have a vested interest in persuading people that there's no benefit. But it does give me a niggling worry that maybe I'm stunting DD in some way.
) essentially saying that that will be DD's "fate" if I continue feeding her at night. Now I'm not planning to fully nightwean her at the moment - I consider her partially night-weaned as I followed the Jay Gordon plan when she was about 10 months, in desperation, and now she often only wakes once. But is there any actual evidence, either way, that toddlers need 11/12 hours uninterrupted sleep, and that being fed in the night will lead to long term sleep issues for her?I said in this conversation that one reason I'm not planning to nightwean is because now I work part-time, on two days a week I only see her for 30 mins a day
so the night feed gives me a bit more DD time. She replied that I was obviously doing it for me then, not for DD - how can I say that although yes I do it for me (is that really so wrong, to want to snuggle and connect with my baby
if it doesn't harm her?), I think DD also gets some benefit from extra mummy milk in the night when I've been away all day. I don't really want answers to this last bit as I'm rambling but just wanted to share my thoughts. The emotional connection *for the child* is underestimated I think, particularly by people who haven't bf'd for any length of time and who therefore have a vested interest in persuading people that there's no benefit. But it does give me a niggling worry that maybe I'm stunting DD in some way.






