My son is an extremely visual-spacial learner. An example: last week he asked me how the winter turns into spring. I said "I can't explain it (with words), I will show you." I took a scrap of paper, drew a circle in the center and said "this is the sun." Then I drew a smaller circle and said "this is the earth." Then I drew an elliptical shape around the sun. Without a second to even explain, my son immediately pointed at the furthest end of the ellipse and said "this is winter." I said "yes". He understood the whole thing right away, that the furthest part would be the coldest, and therefore winter. Then he wanted to know where on the ring we were right now, where easter was, when was our trip to california, his birthday, his sisters birthday...
This story is not particularly special or profound. What is important about this story, is that if I had told him, with words, how the winter turns to spring, he would not have understood at all. If I had read him something from a book, he would not have understood. It is because I drew the question that he understood.
My son gets his visual-spacial learning style from me. But being educated in the states, at a rigid catholic school many years ago, with a huge emphasis on memorization and verbal only learning, I did not do well. Something was obviously wrong with me that I could draw advanced mazes and write elegant poetry at 8, but I was too lazy to memorize my multiplication tables.... Nothing was wrong with me. 35 years ago no one knew about asynchronous development or visual-spacial learning.
My question is - do they know about it today? Are schools and teachers aware of visual-spacial learning styles, as well as the more typical auditory-sequential learning? Is subject matter taught by talking, reading, memorization...? Or by doing - by hands on projects, by drawing diagrams....? Are teachers able to be flexible with the diversity of their students?
I know it will depend on the specific teacher, school.... I'm asking in more general terms. I guess I am asking if it has gotten better?
This story is not particularly special or profound. What is important about this story, is that if I had told him, with words, how the winter turns to spring, he would not have understood at all. If I had read him something from a book, he would not have understood. It is because I drew the question that he understood.
My son gets his visual-spacial learning style from me. But being educated in the states, at a rigid catholic school many years ago, with a huge emphasis on memorization and verbal only learning, I did not do well. Something was obviously wrong with me that I could draw advanced mazes and write elegant poetry at 8, but I was too lazy to memorize my multiplication tables.... Nothing was wrong with me. 35 years ago no one knew about asynchronous development or visual-spacial learning.
My question is - do they know about it today? Are schools and teachers aware of visual-spacial learning styles, as well as the more typical auditory-sequential learning? Is subject matter taught by talking, reading, memorization...? Or by doing - by hands on projects, by drawing diagrams....? Are teachers able to be flexible with the diversity of their students?
I know it will depend on the specific teacher, school.... I'm asking in more general terms. I guess I am asking if it has gotten better?









:
Follow Mothering