Is it true that breastfeeding mothers only confer immunity to diseases to their child if they themselves have had exposure to the disease (not through a vaccine?).
Thanks.
Thanks.
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
(immunity is only provided while bfing right?)| Well‐documented determinants of the level of antibody to measles virus in pregnant women are prior measles exposure and vaccination history. It has been observed in several developed countries that women with natural exposure to measles have significantly higher levels of antibody to measles virus than do those who are vaccinated. |
| Another variable of interest is the boosting effect of repeated exposures to measles, as this effect could imply that there are sustained high levels of antibody to measles virus in pregnant women living in areas of high endemicity. The degree and long‐term duration of the boosting effect from repeated exposures were first studied by Krugman et al. |
| However, measles vaccination impacts the duration of protection afforded by transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies: vaccination-induced maternal antibodies disappear faster than disease-induced antibodies. |
|
From what I understand (from an immunologist) your body usually doesn't know where the disease came from: a vaccine or a disease. The parts of the virus that your body recognizes and builds an immunity against are present in the disease and the vaccine. That's what makes them effective. Again, that's what I've heard from someone who works in the field. She said that's how they work. HTH!
|
|
if this were true than vaccine induced immunity would offer lifetime protection as natural immunity does.....yet it doesn't. Not to mention your body certainly knows the difference between HOW the disease is introduced in the first place. (ie natural vs injected.)
|
|
I personally prefer to see the information an expert is basing their opinion on, rather than take their opinion at face value.
|
