Quote:
Originally Posted by wombatclay 
Hmmmm.... dd1 was a 42+ week babe and was 9lbs6oz at birth. There were pregnancy complications that resulted in several u/s. I think the 40wk u/s put her at about 9lbs so they were pretty close.
|
To me, that sounds pretty off. If she was 9lbs at 40 weeks and had over two more weeks to grow, you'd expect her to have been between 10-10.5 lbs, that's a whole pound off.
If you look, u/s is supposed to be correct at estimating birth with something like +/- 20-25%. To me, that's just about worthless.
SIL had a planned c-section on a Monday at 36 weeks. The Friday before they estimated the baby at 7lb 12oz. She was born at 6lb 12oz. This was a child who was going to go straight into daycare and was born in November. She ended up hospitalized for RSV that winter and I can't help but think if she had gotten to cook a little longer she would have been better off.
My sister was encouraged to have a c-section because the baby was so big, 9+ lbs. She was 7lb 6oz, I think--- definately no bigger. Then she had a c-section with her next because she *obviously* couldn't have a vaginal birth
