Hi mamas,
I'm here looking for a little validation I guess. I'm planning on trying a naturopath soon but since we have no out-of-network medical benefits and no alternative practitioners on the list, I've been hesitant to make the financial commitment to trying to find the "right" person.
But, I have type 2 diabetes (came on a year or so after a pregnancy with GD--was insulin-dependent during the PG) and high blood pressure that I'm trying to manage/improve through exercise and weightloss and I don't have a supportive doc. I've failed metformin (terrible side effects) and have been hesitant to start BP meds, though I did agree to start a diuretic (but haven't started it just yet).
My doc (np actually) wants to put me on something else for my BG. Either a low dose of Lantus or one of a few other drugs that would likely cause weight-gain. I said no...my A1C hovers around 6.9 (which is controlled for a diabetic) and 7.5 (which is too high)...that I want to spend 6-12 months getting healthier and then re-evaluate. She basically said I'd be doing permanent damage if I waited. I don't agree based on my A1Cs that I don't have 6-12 months on this. I don't want to gain weight from meds and have even bigger BG and BP issues.
Then there's the BP, which is often as high as 160/110 at the doctor's office. I do have white-coat syndrome and had a home machine which always put me at no more than 125/75 (and often less). I started suspecting is was wrong so I took it in and sure enough, it was still low while the office's was high. So I replaced it with a wrist machine that I do feel is accurate. It was 145+/95+ at home often when I first got it.
I started working on *real* changes about a month ago (after spending a couple months just purely in denial that I had to do *something*) and my BP is down quite a bit....never over 140/90 and often more in the 130's/80-something. I know that's still not controlled but I also know I've only been doing this for a month and I'm increasing the amount I'm exercising every week. I think it's reasonable that in another 5 months (I gave myself 6 months to get the BP under control) that I will have lost enough weight and improved my health overall enough that I won't need the meds for BP.
I start doubting myself as I have two acquaintances who've been admitted to the hospital recently because their BP was in the 145/95 range...and they were told that's basically ready-to-have-a-stroke level and needed meds. immediately. My np, who seems pretty alarmist about my issues, even doesn't say that about that range.
Of course if my plan doesn't work I will have to go on the meds...but I'm just trying to make sure I'm not putting myself at significant risk by taking 6 months to really work on my weight and fitness.
Thoughts?
I'm here looking for a little validation I guess. I'm planning on trying a naturopath soon but since we have no out-of-network medical benefits and no alternative practitioners on the list, I've been hesitant to make the financial commitment to trying to find the "right" person.
But, I have type 2 diabetes (came on a year or so after a pregnancy with GD--was insulin-dependent during the PG) and high blood pressure that I'm trying to manage/improve through exercise and weightloss and I don't have a supportive doc. I've failed metformin (terrible side effects) and have been hesitant to start BP meds, though I did agree to start a diuretic (but haven't started it just yet).
My doc (np actually) wants to put me on something else for my BG. Either a low dose of Lantus or one of a few other drugs that would likely cause weight-gain. I said no...my A1C hovers around 6.9 (which is controlled for a diabetic) and 7.5 (which is too high)...that I want to spend 6-12 months getting healthier and then re-evaluate. She basically said I'd be doing permanent damage if I waited. I don't agree based on my A1Cs that I don't have 6-12 months on this. I don't want to gain weight from meds and have even bigger BG and BP issues.
Then there's the BP, which is often as high as 160/110 at the doctor's office. I do have white-coat syndrome and had a home machine which always put me at no more than 125/75 (and often less). I started suspecting is was wrong so I took it in and sure enough, it was still low while the office's was high. So I replaced it with a wrist machine that I do feel is accurate. It was 145+/95+ at home often when I first got it.
I started working on *real* changes about a month ago (after spending a couple months just purely in denial that I had to do *something*) and my BP is down quite a bit....never over 140/90 and often more in the 130's/80-something. I know that's still not controlled but I also know I've only been doing this for a month and I'm increasing the amount I'm exercising every week. I think it's reasonable that in another 5 months (I gave myself 6 months to get the BP under control) that I will have lost enough weight and improved my health overall enough that I won't need the meds for BP.
I start doubting myself as I have two acquaintances who've been admitted to the hospital recently because their BP was in the 145/95 range...and they were told that's basically ready-to-have-a-stroke level and needed meds. immediately. My np, who seems pretty alarmist about my issues, even doesn't say that about that range.
Of course if my plan doesn't work I will have to go on the meds...but I'm just trying to make sure I'm not putting myself at significant risk by taking 6 months to really work on my weight and fitness.
Thoughts?










