Quote:
Originally Posted by MissinNYC 
That's not true, actually. I know several people who were having trouble with their teenaged (non adopted) children and went to DHS/CPS and asked for the child to be removed from the home and and it was done. The families got support and the kids were put into residential treatment centers and eventually returned when things settled down.
|
There are ways to get help, agreed. I have had the unfortunate experience of helping a friend restrain, multiple times, and then admit to in-patient psych treatment her 7yo bio son for danger to self and others. He was on medicaid, and there was never a question or blip. With private insurance, it may be harder, I don't know. Even not knowing what I know about attachment/RAD, that experience made the statement by the Russion authority about a 7yo not being a danger ludicrous. I had the marks, bites, and bruises for weeks, as did his mother and younger brother. I am one of his absolute favorite people normally, and if he could have seriously hurt/killed me he would have. It is not an experience I would ever want to repeat. Living that would have been a nightmare--the weeks that I lived it peripherally gave me nightmares and anxiety. The only thing that I can think of that sort of makes this make sense is that she reached out and was ignored or judged or something, and she was gunshy to try again, and then got desperate fast. Even that doesn't fit completely with what the news story say (the G-ma seems so overly rational and calculated), but I guess I just can't believe that a rational non-desperate mom could just send her child away in that manner. I have to believe a Mom could not.
Follow Mothering