Quick background - I'm Rh- and have been treated with Rhogam in both my pregnancies around 8 wks (due to bleeding), the 28 week, and the post-partum shot. My daughter was born 18 months ago.
I had some blood work done as a result of heavy bleeding after IUD removal (we are TTC) and the dr called me yesterday to say that I had the anti-D in my blood. Which....since my last Rhogam shot was 18 months ago, is a little weird, right?
Does this mean I am sensitized? Could it be that I got pregnant on the IUD and my body started manufacturing the anti-D? The dr said that it's unusual but possible for it to STILL be there after so long.
They did tell me to come in for an appt early, as soon as I find out I'm pregnant....but then I read that fetus development of the antibody isn't until 7 weeks (but since Rhogam lasts 12 weeks it wouldn't matter?)
I'm a little confused and a little freaked out by what I'm finding on google. Any thoughts?
Thanks!
I had some blood work done as a result of heavy bleeding after IUD removal (we are TTC) and the dr called me yesterday to say that I had the anti-D in my blood. Which....since my last Rhogam shot was 18 months ago, is a little weird, right?
Does this mean I am sensitized? Could it be that I got pregnant on the IUD and my body started manufacturing the anti-D? The dr said that it's unusual but possible for it to STILL be there after so long.
They did tell me to come in for an appt early, as soon as I find out I'm pregnant....but then I read that fetus development of the antibody isn't until 7 weeks (but since Rhogam lasts 12 weeks it wouldn't matter?)
I'm a little confused and a little freaked out by what I'm finding on google. Any thoughts?
Thanks!






