i recently posted a thread regarding how c-sections fit into a natural birth framework and there was a very productive discussion regarding ways that the community could focus on being inclusive.
below are some highlights from this discussion that i'd like to explore further:
from _ktg_:
- an area to feel support for those mothers who have undergone c/s, to have an opportunity to be listened to, to be angry (if needed) and to have support from others who have BTDT
- Encourage local communities, free-standing birth centers, natural parenting groups to begin or sponsor c/s support groups to reach out to those women who need the support (?)
- Figure out how to mobilize education efforts with all the various audiences (HCP i.e. ob/gyns, midwives, CNMs, doulas, expectant mothers etc) with regards to the c-section rate in the us and what choices, options, practices occur in communities and the drivers behind those practices
from guildjenn:
- care paid to the rhetorical language used in discussing birth; not only are there real women and babies behind the stories (even the designer c-section ones) but I think it derails the NCB to focus heavily on c-sections and doesn't serve women well if they fear a c-section more than anything else. The c-section rate is significant as an indicator, but it is hardly the only one having everyone in twilight sleep with forceps wouldn't be any more respectful, so let's talk about interventions and not just one possible intervention
- a focus on what would actually help people make better decisions, rather than dictating the outcome: More respect and training for midwives, more research, more dialogue between midwives and OBs and L&D nursing staff
- a more balanced look at risks and advantages/disadvantages of certain
decisions in labour
- more discussion around "when labour goes off the rails" that does not insinuate that it is a lack of desire or planning on the mother's part
from savithny:
When the most important part of a BIRTH ANNOUNCEMENT becomes hashing out what went wrong, that's a sign that a lot of people are not paying attention to the right time, the right place, and the real feelings behind each statistic.
from redoakmama:
I don't want to derail, but can we pursue this? What language, what support, what approaches to NCB team ourselves with women who've had c-section births? How can it be less exclusionary? What terms hurt, and which ones support? What insinuations are made that we can look out for, and call out as unfair or hurtful? What can be done to remove that "layer of disenfranchisement for women who have already been through a lot."?
-----------
so opinions? thoughts? additional ideas on ways to move forward?
below are some highlights from this discussion that i'd like to explore further:
from _ktg_:
- an area to feel support for those mothers who have undergone c/s, to have an opportunity to be listened to, to be angry (if needed) and to have support from others who have BTDT
- Encourage local communities, free-standing birth centers, natural parenting groups to begin or sponsor c/s support groups to reach out to those women who need the support (?)
- Figure out how to mobilize education efforts with all the various audiences (HCP i.e. ob/gyns, midwives, CNMs, doulas, expectant mothers etc) with regards to the c-section rate in the us and what choices, options, practices occur in communities and the drivers behind those practices
from guildjenn:
- care paid to the rhetorical language used in discussing birth; not only are there real women and babies behind the stories (even the designer c-section ones) but I think it derails the NCB to focus heavily on c-sections and doesn't serve women well if they fear a c-section more than anything else. The c-section rate is significant as an indicator, but it is hardly the only one having everyone in twilight sleep with forceps wouldn't be any more respectful, so let's talk about interventions and not just one possible intervention
- a focus on what would actually help people make better decisions, rather than dictating the outcome: More respect and training for midwives, more research, more dialogue between midwives and OBs and L&D nursing staff
- a more balanced look at risks and advantages/disadvantages of certain
decisions in labour
- more discussion around "when labour goes off the rails" that does not insinuate that it is a lack of desire or planning on the mother's part
from savithny:
When the most important part of a BIRTH ANNOUNCEMENT becomes hashing out what went wrong, that's a sign that a lot of people are not paying attention to the right time, the right place, and the real feelings behind each statistic.
from redoakmama:
I don't want to derail, but can we pursue this? What language, what support, what approaches to NCB team ourselves with women who've had c-section births? How can it be less exclusionary? What terms hurt, and which ones support? What insinuations are made that we can look out for, and call out as unfair or hurtful? What can be done to remove that "layer of disenfranchisement for women who have already been through a lot."?
-----------
so opinions? thoughts? additional ideas on ways to move forward?







