Quote:
Originally Posted by seashells 
I don't think anybody suggested that. People were suggesting that the OP offer to host the sleepover. The birthday girl's mother indicated that she was drawing the line at 2 girls to sleep over, so we are guessing she feels overwhelmed by hosting 4 girls. If the OP's mother is ok hosting 4 girls it might be the best solution for everyone. Birthday girl gets to have all girls, OP's girl isn't childishly and cruelly excluded, and birthday girl's mother doesn't have to deal with the sleepover. I don't see that as tit-for-tat at all, but a kind solution for everyone.
The way it's going right now, it seems the birthday girl will only have 2 girls at her party, as the OP is planning on extending her vacation because of the rudeness and the other girl's mother has already indicated that she won't be coming (and it sounds like a reasonable chance is that she doesn't care for the exclusive nature of the party either). So the fourth girl might actually come too if the exclusion is taken out of the equation. Not in the slightest tit-for-tat, nor is it leaving anybody out - it's precisely the opposite.
|
Seashells - I think there is a lot of misunderstanding on this thread.
I could be wrong but, I think you read the post wrong. The original suggestion to have a sleep over at the OP's house was from Christy Marie - this is what she said
Quote:
| Why not contact the mom of the other little girl who wasn't invited to the sleepover portion and see if she would like to spend the night at your house? Depending on how they are feeling about the situation they could either go to the party first or just skip it and do something fun at your house. |
You are the one that took it further and suggested that the entire sleepover be at the OP's house.
My comments about children being excluded were in reference to Christy's suggestion that the OP invite the other uninvited child to just sleep over at her house after the party.
Your suggesting that the entire sleep over party be held at the OP's house came later after, it seems, that you mis read Christy's post. I could be wrong about that.
However, both of those suggestions to me seem rude and self centered. This party is not about the OP's daughter. This party is about the birthday girl. So, to suggest that the sleepover part of the party be moved to the OP's house or that the OP should host a sleep over for the other uninvited girl after the party moves the focus of the party to the OP's child and what's most comfortable for her.
I'm really starting to agree with yokosmile.
These are the parameters of the party. If the OP or her daughter aren't comfortable with them, they don't have to go.
But, to label this mom as rude and uncaring to me seems just over the top. We have no idea about this woman. No idea at all. We don't know her reasons for what she did. We just assumed she's heartless and rude. It's amazing to me how we tear other women down for their choices when we know NOTHING about them.
If the OP's daughter is uncomfortable with the situation, she doesn't have to go. But, I loved what yokosmile said about using this as an opportunity to teach about grace.
Every one of our children are not the center of the universe. Our children will not be invited to every single event. Every situation our children find themselves in will not be fair.
Is out job as parents to make every situation fair? Or is it our job as parents to teach our children how to maneuver through a world that isn't always fair and that doesn't always consider their individual needs and to do it with grace?