Anyone had good luck refusing dental (or other medical x-rays) without your dentist firing you?
I am not convinced that dental x-rays are "safe," despite the widespread mantra of how we supposedly get more radiation from everyday living. I don't really care to add man-made radiation to my natural daily dose.
I also don't think that the mainstream sources are completely honest with the numbers. They claim, for instance, that one receives about 300 mrem of radiation per year just being alive. And they say that 4 digital bite-wing x-rays give an "effective dose" of "only" (as if any amount of radiation is innocuous) 1.3 mrem. But actually just one digital bite-wing has a skin entrance exposure of 90 mrem. So, the 300 mrem dose that's widely quoted for daily living--is that the "effective dose" or the "skin entrance" dose? It seems like they're comparing apples with oranges in terms of methods of measuring the radiation dose.
I don't care if I get radiation from flying in an airplane; there's no need to add to it with medical x-rays that aren't absolutely crucial for saving a life. Radiation exposure is cumulative over our lifetimes. That means every little mrem counts towards our total lifetime burden of radiation. The more lifetime total of radiation, the more chance of health damage.
Here's an interesting article: Low Levels Of Ionizing Radiation May Cause Harm.
So, anyone else who feels unsettled in regards to x-rays?
I am not convinced that dental x-rays are "safe," despite the widespread mantra of how we supposedly get more radiation from everyday living. I don't really care to add man-made radiation to my natural daily dose.
I also don't think that the mainstream sources are completely honest with the numbers. They claim, for instance, that one receives about 300 mrem of radiation per year just being alive. And they say that 4 digital bite-wing x-rays give an "effective dose" of "only" (as if any amount of radiation is innocuous) 1.3 mrem. But actually just one digital bite-wing has a skin entrance exposure of 90 mrem. So, the 300 mrem dose that's widely quoted for daily living--is that the "effective dose" or the "skin entrance" dose? It seems like they're comparing apples with oranges in terms of methods of measuring the radiation dose.
I don't care if I get radiation from flying in an airplane; there's no need to add to it with medical x-rays that aren't absolutely crucial for saving a life. Radiation exposure is cumulative over our lifetimes. That means every little mrem counts towards our total lifetime burden of radiation. The more lifetime total of radiation, the more chance of health damage.
Here's an interesting article: Low Levels Of Ionizing Radiation May Cause Harm.
So, anyone else who feels unsettled in regards to x-rays?











Yes, your DH is amazing! I am laughing so hard right now.