So here's the thing. I am considering moving into a house with my mother. It's not for sure a good idea because we have HUGE differences, but we were discussing it, at any rate. One of the things we were talking about is the problem of religion. She is Catholic and I am Pagan. I was 15 when I started being interested; she was very upset and forbid me to have anything to do with Paganism, wouldn't let me have books or spiritual items. Fine, sure. I respected that and eventually moved out and started my own household where I am freely and openly Pagan.
Since both my mother and I are quite religious and have items all over the house from our spiritual traditions, this was something that I brought up as a potential difficulty in living together. I can definitely respect her religious "things" (like holy water fonts, crucifixes, pictures of saints, etc.) while she is less accepting of my "things" (a broom by the door, some pentacle candle holders, a charity cauldron on the hearth, a wooden pentacle in the kitchen, etc.). We talked it over and she said she wouldn't have a problem with most of these things (although I had to explain the pentacle to her; after all these years she STILL thought it was a Satanic symbol).
The one thing that she said she could NOT live with because she found it "absolutely repulsive" is the figure we have on our hearth, the Mother. It is a representation of the Venus of Willendorf and practically the holiest item I can think of. It represents the Divine. (I am monotheistic Pagan so I can't just substitute a different goddess image really.) I was shocked when she said that. She said that was not something she could tolerate seeing because it was just so ugly.
Now... I was speechless. First of all, it's just an image of a nude woman. It's not grotesque in any way that I can think of. I wouldn't dream of saying "hey you know what, please don't put a crucifix in my eyesight because the image of a murdered man is really a turnoff to me." That would be... I mean, I just wouldn't say that to her! So why is it OK to say that the way I view my Creator is repulsive? And when it's just the figure of a woman, at that? Maybe if I had a photo of Kali or Ganesh or something "unnatural" I could see her point - not that I think those images are "ugly" at all and I know they are perfectly sacred to many people - but they are not quite "human" - so they might be a little hard to swallow for someone who is not used to them. But the Venus of Willendorf? Really?
A) Was she being insensitive or am I being *TOO* sensitive?
B) For those of you who are Christian and/or other, would you be "repulsed" by that image? Is it "gross" or something? Am I just that far off the batty loop that I'm not seeing what is ugly about her?
Since both my mother and I are quite religious and have items all over the house from our spiritual traditions, this was something that I brought up as a potential difficulty in living together. I can definitely respect her religious "things" (like holy water fonts, crucifixes, pictures of saints, etc.) while she is less accepting of my "things" (a broom by the door, some pentacle candle holders, a charity cauldron on the hearth, a wooden pentacle in the kitchen, etc.). We talked it over and she said she wouldn't have a problem with most of these things (although I had to explain the pentacle to her; after all these years she STILL thought it was a Satanic symbol).
The one thing that she said she could NOT live with because she found it "absolutely repulsive" is the figure we have on our hearth, the Mother. It is a representation of the Venus of Willendorf and practically the holiest item I can think of. It represents the Divine. (I am monotheistic Pagan so I can't just substitute a different goddess image really.) I was shocked when she said that. She said that was not something she could tolerate seeing because it was just so ugly.
Now... I was speechless. First of all, it's just an image of a nude woman. It's not grotesque in any way that I can think of. I wouldn't dream of saying "hey you know what, please don't put a crucifix in my eyesight because the image of a murdered man is really a turnoff to me." That would be... I mean, I just wouldn't say that to her! So why is it OK to say that the way I view my Creator is repulsive? And when it's just the figure of a woman, at that? Maybe if I had a photo of Kali or Ganesh or something "unnatural" I could see her point - not that I think those images are "ugly" at all and I know they are perfectly sacred to many people - but they are not quite "human" - so they might be a little hard to swallow for someone who is not used to them. But the Venus of Willendorf? Really?
A) Was she being insensitive or am I being *TOO* sensitive?
B) For those of you who are Christian and/or other, would you be "repulsed" by that image? Is it "gross" or something? Am I just that far off the batty loop that I'm not seeing what is ugly about her?











) and some other minor graces here and there (like if someone gets hurt or if we hear a siren in the distance).
The rosary etc too is a private thing.



I'm sorry she hurt your feelings. It would really hurt mine if someone said something similar about an object of religious devotion in my home. Although I've said the same thing about Thomas Kinkaid paintings.

I agree that it's not everyone's cup of tea. Honestly to me the whole "it's not a graven image because there is no face shown" - that makes sense to ME, and I'm comfortable with that - but I can see how it might be shredding hairs to other people. Just as some Christians are OK with a cross, but not a crucifix, because one is a symbol and the other is a graven image. But, I digress.