sorry
T fizzymom, please PM me if you find more info. I am really very interested in this.
T fizzymom, please PM me if you find more info. I am really very interested in this.Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
T fizzymom, please PM me if you find more info. I am really very interested in this.
I think you just lit a fire under my butt!!
| Is is okay to medicate someone against their will? In some states, if you are mentally ill, and on psychiatric drugs, you can be legally forced back on them- even if you think you no longer need them. |

| Some people say that the surgical birth alone could have killed her babies, well, had she had the csection the day she was told she needed it, there is not a doubt in my mind they would have lived. |
| Originally posted by lollaleeloo Not the hospital, not the coroner, not even the prosecutors are claiming that drug/alcohol/tobacco use played any part in the death of her child. |

| Originally posted by lollaleeloo Of all the places on the web to read a statement like this. Nobody knows when the baby died. Nobody knows how the baby died. Nobody knows why the baby died. Nobody that is, except those who would presume to call the mother of a stillborn infant a criminal (if not an outright killer) based solely upon the one and only thing that *is* known about the death at this time: where it occured, which was, tragically, inside her body. In light of the complete LACK OF ANY EVIDENCE to the contrary, the cruel judgements and pure speculation about her illicit drug, alcohol & tobacco use causing the death of her child remain just that: cruel judgements and pure speculation. The fact that her surviving twin tested positive for the aforementioned substances in no way indicates whether their use contributed to the death of her other twin, anymore than it indicates whether or not an earlier c-section would have saved him. Bottom line is, without knowing what killed him, there is absolutely no basis for claiming that had he been cut out sooner, he'd be alive today. None whatsoever. Not the hospital, not the coroner, not even the prosecutors are claiming that drug/alcohol/tobacco use played any part in the death of her child. Her lifestyle, her troubled past, her illnesses, and even uncorroborated reports of her personal vanity -- are all being used for the purpose of demonizing her in the eyes of the public, and whaddya know: it's working. Make no mistake, people. This woman mourning her dead baby sits in jail tonight for the sole crime of defying doctors' orders, and there but for the grace of God go any one of us. I'm not only shocked and horrified to read some of the comments I've read in this thread, I'm heartbroken. That so many here would unashamedly indulge in this 'Serves her right' mentality just floors me. |
You rock.
| Originally posted by Greaseball And many of these drugs are not safe for pregnant women, according to the Physician's Desk Reference. ![]() The message seems to be that it's OK for doctors to endanger babies, but not for mothers to do so. And I still don't see how the baby would have lived if the c/s was done. |
| Originally posted by lollaleeloo Her lifestyle, her troubled past, her illnesses, and even uncorroborated reports of her personal vanity -- are all being used for the purpose of demonizing her in the eyes of the public, and whaddya know: it's working. Make no mistake, people. This woman mourning her dead baby sits in jail tonight for the sole crime of defying doctors' orders, and there but for the grace of God go any one of us. |
). You gave some excellent examples of how we really do need to take care of each other, and how one person reaching out can make a difference... I am sure this woman was told a million times to get clean, but I can't help but wonder if anyone ever took the time to reach out to her and say, 'get clean... for yourself... you are worth it, and I care."
| As a mother to a child with a "mental" illness I work hard to teach my som empathy and right from wrong. I try to teach him, even though it is difficult and he is young, that he has to take responsibility for his actions -- even if they were impulsive, even if he didnt mean to hurt someone, even if he broke something in a rage. When he is an adult he will face a society that will expect more of him than I do. If he can't comform to those norms, he may end up in prison or a mental institution. I can only empower him so much before sending him into the world. Once he is an adult -- he must take responsibility for those actions, even if he doesnt not fully understand or his intent was not to harm. |
| Originally posted by XM Lauren, you rock. Your compassion and common sense will make you an outstanding midwife (wanna come catch #3? ). You gave some excellent examples of how we really do need to take care of each other, and how one person reaching out can make a difference... I am sure this woman was told a million times to get clean, but I can't help but wonder if anyone ever took the time to reach out to her and say, 'get clean... for yourself... you are worth it, and I care." |
And I will stay in WA for a month or more to do so! (I'm allowed to attend 2 long distance births a year, per: DP. :LOL)
| Originally posted by OnTheFence The baby was alive all three times they told her she needed to have a csection. It doesnt take that long to do one in emergency situations. The equipment is there to resuscitate and incubate. |
| Originally posted by Greaseball I find it interesting that when babies die from mainstream practices like circumcision, formula feeding, or elective inductions/surgery, no one wants to charge anyone with murder; they write it off as bad luck. |
T Just don't have #3, XM when I have #2! I want you too Lauren!! 

and I'm down to only getting into like 2 threads a day. This is one of them for today.