This is weird. I found this quote:
"But Rowland is adamant, she was never told she needed a c-section. "I didn't refuse a c-section, they were born by c-section."
And yet she signed a waiver, she had to, right?
I am very worried about the prosecution of this myself (THIS SHOULD NOT BE PROSECUTED!) and would write a letter and pritest this being prosecuted. *However* this case just gives me weird vibes. It sounds a little like she might be suffering from some schizophrenic delusions. I'm not sure, but that's the vibe I get. She doesn't seem like a UCer to me.
However, the media is really prone to getting things wrong, so I am reserving judgement. But...wow. If I were the defending attorney, I would get her a psych eval. To not remember being told she needed an immediate C-section? That's odd.
Poor mama. Poor babies.