Some friends of ours were over this weekend and when she was changing her son, I noticed that I could not see the head of his penis..but he is circ'd. She asked me about it and I told her that my guess whas that it was just trying to be covered like it was when he was born. I told her that the glans was supposed to be covered. When she was changing him, I saw her retract it and wipe off the glans. Then maybe a half an hour later, I started thinking that maybe this is what people refer to as a loose circumcision. I brought up the topic again and told her that it was probably a good thing that it was like that because her son would still have some of the protective benefits of the foreskin. I also told her that if she ever had a Dr. tell her they needed to re-circ her son that he is just fine and not to listen to them.
My question is, in this case, should she treat it as circ'd and retract and whipe since poop could get inside or should she leave it alone as if it were intact? Would it re-adhere? Thank you for your input.
My question is, in this case, should she treat it as circ'd and retract and whipe since poop could get inside or should she leave it alone as if it were intact? Would it re-adhere? Thank you for your input.
