Originally Posted by heathergirl67
Newmum- I see what you're saying. You're thinking that when kids are injured by vaxes it's because of some ingredient other than the virus. Is that right?
This is right, exactly what I meant. This is well known and is one reason why a true placebo is rarely if ever used when studying side effects from a new vaccine. Instead they use another vaccine, or a shot of aluminum. People can and do react to these "other ingredients" present in vaccines.
|But even if that's the case, then why are those kids more reactive (to whatever the trigger was) than the majority of kids, who don't seem to suffer any ill effects?
Perhaps the better question is not why some kids suffer from vaccine reactions, but why some kids (most
in your opinion) do not
? Exactly what is protecting some people from NOT suffering vaccine reactions? Just like the poster who mentioned lung cancer and cigarettes. We should not be asking ourselves "what is wrong with those who smoke and then get lung cancer?" but what we should be studying instead is "what is protecting those who abuse their lungs with cigarettes and then live to be 100 while never getting cancer?"
I don't believe people who smoke and then get lung cancer have a genetic flaw. I don't believe that people who experience vaccine reactions have a genetic flaw. I believe that all the others are very lucky for dodging the same fate and it would benefit us all to find out how they did it. We already know that levels of vitamin C play a significant role. The aborigines of australia, up to half of all babies getting vaccines were dying (From the reactions). Until it was discovered they were deficient in vitamin C. Fix that, and voila, suddenly the death rate or severe vaccine reactions drops. So having an adequate level of this vitamin prevented half the babies from sharing the same fate.
|And why do some seemingly previously healthy kids get extremely sick or die from an illness that the majority of kids can tolerate?
"Seemingly" is the key word here. In the majority of cases I do believe they are not as healthy as claimed. And in the rest, it could have simply been the treatment that did them in, with trying to suppress a fever being a big no-no as one example.