Who here has used Great Plains? Did your results seem accurate? Did you start a treatment plan based on results, and did that help? Or I guess- have you used any other independent labs for comprehensive stool and OAT urine testing, and how did that turn out?
I'm a little baffled, and need some opinions. In January, we did a comprehensive stool and OAT urine test for DD. There were quite a few things out of the normal range- like all her inflammation markers were off the charts, no big surprise there. But the 2 most concerning things were a bacterial overgrowth on her stool test (klebsiella oxytoca) and an oxalic acid level in her urine that was off the charts.
The DAN! doc that ordered the tests was most concerned with the bacterial overgrowth, and started us on a product with gse (gse was shown on the test results as one of the most effective treatments for this type of klebsiella.) He wanted us to retest in like 6 weeks, but talking to the biochemist(?) at the lab she said there was no way we would see results that quickly, so we put it off. (And we were waiting for insurance to process to see if any would be paid.)
We did the gse product for 2 weeks, then DD wouldn't take it anymore so we stopped. The following week, we saw a GI guy who also ordered the standard stool test. That came back completely clean- no overgrowth whatsoever. I understand that the 2 labs might be looking at different types of bacteria for their respective test, but the regular lab assured me that they would spot an overgrowth of any kind. So there's my
#1. Did the gse product completely get rid of the overgrowth in 2 weeks? Or did she not have an overgrowth to begin with? Or...?
So- oxalic acid was way off the charts. We've started using a bit of vitamin K, really just a sprinkle here and there (probably <1mg, a few times a week?) We also tried to lower our oxalate intake, but we really haven't put a whole lot of effort into that. We're boiling broccoli instead of steaming, things like that. But our diet hasn't changed at all. I asked our ped if she could order an oxalate urine test through the regular lab, because I didn't want to pay for the entire OAT again. I made some calls, found that the lab can do an oxalate test- it's a 24-hour urine test. So we just got the call that our results are in, and they are completely normal. Oxalate level of 33, with a range of 0-38 being normal. So there's
#2. Did the addition of a tiny bit of K completely take care of the extra oxalates? Did she actually have an oxalate problem? Are these just 2 completely different types of oxalate measurement and therefore not comparible? (ftr- after much discussion here, and seeing DD's insane reaction to supplemental calcium, we assumed that the oxalates were elevated because DD was having issues with calcium regulation, so her body was producing the excess oxalates to deal with the rogue calcium floating around her body.)
I'm really curious about these conflicting lab results. I would love to redo the Great Plains tests again, but there's no way I am spending another $700 if there's a chance these tests aren't accurate.
Thoughts? Experiences?
I'm a little baffled, and need some opinions. In January, we did a comprehensive stool and OAT urine test for DD. There were quite a few things out of the normal range- like all her inflammation markers were off the charts, no big surprise there. But the 2 most concerning things were a bacterial overgrowth on her stool test (klebsiella oxytoca) and an oxalic acid level in her urine that was off the charts.
The DAN! doc that ordered the tests was most concerned with the bacterial overgrowth, and started us on a product with gse (gse was shown on the test results as one of the most effective treatments for this type of klebsiella.) He wanted us to retest in like 6 weeks, but talking to the biochemist(?) at the lab she said there was no way we would see results that quickly, so we put it off. (And we were waiting for insurance to process to see if any would be paid.)
We did the gse product for 2 weeks, then DD wouldn't take it anymore so we stopped. The following week, we saw a GI guy who also ordered the standard stool test. That came back completely clean- no overgrowth whatsoever. I understand that the 2 labs might be looking at different types of bacteria for their respective test, but the regular lab assured me that they would spot an overgrowth of any kind. So there's my
#1. Did the gse product completely get rid of the overgrowth in 2 weeks? Or did she not have an overgrowth to begin with? Or...?So- oxalic acid was way off the charts. We've started using a bit of vitamin K, really just a sprinkle here and there (probably <1mg, a few times a week?) We also tried to lower our oxalate intake, but we really haven't put a whole lot of effort into that. We're boiling broccoli instead of steaming, things like that. But our diet hasn't changed at all. I asked our ped if she could order an oxalate urine test through the regular lab, because I didn't want to pay for the entire OAT again. I made some calls, found that the lab can do an oxalate test- it's a 24-hour urine test. So we just got the call that our results are in, and they are completely normal. Oxalate level of 33, with a range of 0-38 being normal. So there's
#2. Did the addition of a tiny bit of K completely take care of the extra oxalates? Did she actually have an oxalate problem? Are these just 2 completely different types of oxalate measurement and therefore not comparible? (ftr- after much discussion here, and seeing DD's insane reaction to supplemental calcium, we assumed that the oxalates were elevated because DD was having issues with calcium regulation, so her body was producing the excess oxalates to deal with the rogue calcium floating around her body.)I'm really curious about these conflicting lab results. I would love to redo the Great Plains tests again, but there's no way I am spending another $700 if there's a chance these tests aren't accurate.
Thoughts? Experiences?









Her blood calcium is also pretty high, so based on all that we figured she was making oxalates to keep her high calcium in check (which means that supplementing calcium would make it even worse.)