Do these two kind of go together?
DH was talking with a friend at church and our friend spanks his two year old. They are very gentle and loving parents...I think they're just pressured by their parents to spank and do time-outs and stuff, and they have a very active two year old like us. Anyway, DH told him we don't spank and our friend asked what we do for punishment. DH told him that for the specific behavior they had been talking about, we do separate ds from whomever he's around (I think it was hitting?).
So DH and I were talking later and DH had kind of felt like he was making it sound like we don't do anything for ds's behavior and let him get away with everything, even though we don't. So we talked about how to portray unconditional parenting to others when they ask us about it.
We thought that maybe it would help them (and us?) if we explain it that we use natural consequences, but natural consequences that are not punitive. Does this make sense? Does anyone else think of it this way?
I think dh and I need to sit down and talk about some natural consequences that might happen for different situations. Does anyone feel like listing some that you do in your family?
One for us is that if ds is hitting dd (who is one year old) with something, then that object needs to take a break since he's not being safe with it. And then I ask him if he'd like to see if she's okay (sometimes he does and sometimes he doesn't), and I get him to play in a different area and we move on.
Does that sound like unconditional parenting and like a natural consequence?
Thanks for any help you might have. DS is very active and we've really struggled with things and with changing how we deal with situations with him.
~Sheree
DH was talking with a friend at church and our friend spanks his two year old. They are very gentle and loving parents...I think they're just pressured by their parents to spank and do time-outs and stuff, and they have a very active two year old like us. Anyway, DH told him we don't spank and our friend asked what we do for punishment. DH told him that for the specific behavior they had been talking about, we do separate ds from whomever he's around (I think it was hitting?).
So DH and I were talking later and DH had kind of felt like he was making it sound like we don't do anything for ds's behavior and let him get away with everything, even though we don't. So we talked about how to portray unconditional parenting to others when they ask us about it.
We thought that maybe it would help them (and us?) if we explain it that we use natural consequences, but natural consequences that are not punitive. Does this make sense? Does anyone else think of it this way?
I think dh and I need to sit down and talk about some natural consequences that might happen for different situations. Does anyone feel like listing some that you do in your family?
One for us is that if ds is hitting dd (who is one year old) with something, then that object needs to take a break since he's not being safe with it. And then I ask him if he'd like to see if she's okay (sometimes he does and sometimes he doesn't), and I get him to play in a different area and we move on.
Does that sound like unconditional parenting and like a natural consequence?
Thanks for any help you might have. DS is very active and we've really struggled with things and with changing how we deal with situations with him.
~Sheree







Follow Mothering