I have been offered an amazing opportunity and am weighing the pros and cons before deciding whether to accept (and relocate 1,000 miles from our current home).
If I accept this position, I will have the option of either being a regular employee or a contractor. Here's the details of each:
Regular employee: Very livable wage. Work in a nice office with a very flexible/open schedule. PERS retirement and health benefits. On this wage, my rent costs would take up no more than 20% of my income. Commute would be no more than 10 minutes.
Contractor: No office or set hours. Work 100% from home except to attend meetings. No benefits. Pay is $15,000 more than the "regular employee" position to make up for loss of benefits and account for taxes.
Which would you choose? Would you take the benefits over the extra freedom? Or is the extra money and open schedule more important than benefits?
I spent two years working from home and it definitely had its challenges. If i decide to accept this position, I'm really not sure which I would want to do.
If I accept this position, I will have the option of either being a regular employee or a contractor. Here's the details of each:
Regular employee: Very livable wage. Work in a nice office with a very flexible/open schedule. PERS retirement and health benefits. On this wage, my rent costs would take up no more than 20% of my income. Commute would be no more than 10 minutes.
Contractor: No office or set hours. Work 100% from home except to attend meetings. No benefits. Pay is $15,000 more than the "regular employee" position to make up for loss of benefits and account for taxes.
Which would you choose? Would you take the benefits over the extra freedom? Or is the extra money and open schedule more important than benefits?
I spent two years working from home and it definitely had its challenges. If i decide to accept this position, I'm really not sure which I would want to do.








