My in-laws live in another state. So, on Monday my mil was passing through our city, and came by to visit us. We'd been planning on this for a week or so.
When she arrived, she tossed out the idea that dh & the kids could hop on the plane with her and go back to her home for a short visit (dh's work schedule is non-traditional, Monday was the first day of his three days off). If they were to do this, they would be leaving in 3 hours. I have obligations that I cannot just skip out on a whim, so it was understood that I could not go.
I realize this post sounds incredibly privileged; my dh works for an airline & the flights are free & limitless...it's not like anyone has the money to actually buy tickets!
Anyway, our children are 2 and 4.
Mil is very adept at manipulating situations
, she always has been. She really set it up so that I would be wrong if I objected. Well, I still objected.
Our 2 year old is nursing. She's never travelled without me. She's 2; she gets overwhelmed by her emotions sometimes, and dh doesn't handle it as well as I'd like. I said that she absolutely could not go, but if dh wanted to visit his parents that was fine, and it was also ok if he took our 4 year old. So he did it.
It really put me in a bad spot, because I was counting on him to take care of the kids while I took a friend & her new baby to the clinic one day and had lunch with my grandmother at the casino another day. I didn't want to take our two year old to wait at the clinic for hours, and I had to cancel plans with my grandma. We were both disappointed. Of course, if I'd just let the 2 yr old go I could have been free and clear to do whatever I wanted.
What I want to know is--would you have let your 2 year old make that trip? Would anyone have gone?
When she arrived, she tossed out the idea that dh & the kids could hop on the plane with her and go back to her home for a short visit (dh's work schedule is non-traditional, Monday was the first day of his three days off). If they were to do this, they would be leaving in 3 hours. I have obligations that I cannot just skip out on a whim, so it was understood that I could not go.
I realize this post sounds incredibly privileged; my dh works for an airline & the flights are free & limitless...it's not like anyone has the money to actually buy tickets!
Anyway, our children are 2 and 4.
Mil is very adept at manipulating situations
, she always has been. She really set it up so that I would be wrong if I objected. Well, I still objected.Our 2 year old is nursing. She's never travelled without me. She's 2; she gets overwhelmed by her emotions sometimes, and dh doesn't handle it as well as I'd like. I said that she absolutely could not go, but if dh wanted to visit his parents that was fine, and it was also ok if he took our 4 year old. So he did it.
It really put me in a bad spot, because I was counting on him to take care of the kids while I took a friend & her new baby to the clinic one day and had lunch with my grandmother at the casino another day. I didn't want to take our two year old to wait at the clinic for hours, and I had to cancel plans with my grandma. We were both disappointed. Of course, if I'd just let the 2 yr old go I could have been free and clear to do whatever I wanted.
What I want to know is--would you have let your 2 year old make that trip? Would anyone have gone?












: Even if someone said--y"ou've won an all-expense trip to Hawaii, but you have to leave in 3 hours", I'd be nutso!