Alot of what I hear and read mentions that using fetal monitoring (continuous external monitoring) is one of the earliest indicators of a uterine rupture because the baby will have heart decels or appear to be in distress or react to the rupture.
Are you VBAC mama's planning on allowing continuous EFM or are you still planning for intermittent monitoring?? Has anyone done alot of research on this??
I really, really, really would prefer just intermittent monitoring so that I can labor in the shower, walk, ect... as I please - but wondered how much truth there was to it being a clear indicator of a rupture.
Are you VBAC mama's planning on allowing continuous EFM or are you still planning for intermittent monitoring?? Has anyone done alot of research on this??
I really, really, really would prefer just intermittent monitoring so that I can labor in the shower, walk, ect... as I please - but wondered how much truth there was to it being a clear indicator of a rupture.








I understand there are REALLY cases of fetal distress, but there are also TONS of cases where it's really not distress and leads to an unnecessary section.
What on earth does that mean?! That if you don't have EFM that you (or your baby) will surely die in labor? 
