OK, I'm really curious after reading some of the posts, and the comments regarding sexual pleasure being sacrificed with male circ. How would anyone know that, unless someone experienced sex both before and after circumcision? It's a personal thing and based on personal perception, is it not?
Circ. hasn't made my husband a eunuch, that's for sure.
He likes sex plenty. So I totally don't understand this idea that pleasure is sacrificed.
Circ. hasn't made my husband a eunuch, that's for sure.
He likes sex plenty. So I totally don't understand this idea that pleasure is sacrificed.








'cept an eyeball without an eyelid to lubricate and protect it would go blind, I am assuming, while a penis without a foreskin can still have an erection (which, for some circ.'d men, ceases or slows down drastically after middle age and Viagra must be used) and perform sexual functions.
