After recently having my second baby, I'm curious about my labor patterns. I always here labor described as either long or fast, but it seems I have both all in one.
My first labor was induced at 39+4 with prostoglandin gel. That labor was 22 hours of pretty manageable contractions. In that 22 hours I dilated from 1 to 6cm. I was in the hospital with midwives and they determined my labor to be stalled out at 6cm so I got one more dose of the gel. Transition hit and I went from 6cm to baby in arms in 45 minutes. It was crazy intense.
My second labor was a homebirth (spontaneous labor) at 39+5. Again I had about 22 hours of very manageable contractions. They were 20-30 minutes apart for most of that time. Intense but manageable. I treated that day like any other. The only difference was that I had to stop every 20 minutes to breath through a contraction. After about 18 hours of that my water sprung a tiny leak and I had some bloody show. Contractions then became 10 minutes apart, but I was still in early labor.......thinking we could have a long way to go. Two hours later transition hit which is when I really knew it was the real deal. I struggled through that for about an hour. Contractions turned 'pushy' which lasted about a half hour and then I really pushed for about 10 minutes and had me a baby. So again, about 22 hours of easy peasy early labor and then 2 hours of intense stuff until baby was in my arms.
I always thought that my first labor went the way it did because it was artificially induced. But after my second, I now see that it's just my bodies way of laboring. I'm curious if anyone else labors this way? And if you do, how do you classify your labors? Would you say that you are a long laborer or a fast laborer? I guess a better question is (and this is regardless of your labor pattern) do you count the start of labor at the first contraction or at the start of active labor?
My first labor was induced at 39+4 with prostoglandin gel. That labor was 22 hours of pretty manageable contractions. In that 22 hours I dilated from 1 to 6cm. I was in the hospital with midwives and they determined my labor to be stalled out at 6cm so I got one more dose of the gel. Transition hit and I went from 6cm to baby in arms in 45 minutes. It was crazy intense.
My second labor was a homebirth (spontaneous labor) at 39+5. Again I had about 22 hours of very manageable contractions. They were 20-30 minutes apart for most of that time. Intense but manageable. I treated that day like any other. The only difference was that I had to stop every 20 minutes to breath through a contraction. After about 18 hours of that my water sprung a tiny leak and I had some bloody show. Contractions then became 10 minutes apart, but I was still in early labor.......thinking we could have a long way to go. Two hours later transition hit which is when I really knew it was the real deal. I struggled through that for about an hour. Contractions turned 'pushy' which lasted about a half hour and then I really pushed for about 10 minutes and had me a baby. So again, about 22 hours of easy peasy early labor and then 2 hours of intense stuff until baby was in my arms.
I always thought that my first labor went the way it did because it was artificially induced. But after my second, I now see that it's just my bodies way of laboring. I'm curious if anyone else labors this way? And if you do, how do you classify your labors? Would you say that you are a long laborer or a fast laborer? I guess a better question is (and this is regardless of your labor pattern) do you count the start of labor at the first contraction or at the start of active labor?







:
